On Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:55:08 +0000 () Che <zeus8@synthcom.com> writes:
quoted 21 lines On Thu, 31 Jul 1997 tweibrecht@juno.com wrote:>On Thu, 31 Jul 1997 tweibrecht@juno.com wrote:
>
>> as to dsotm 5: remember that this is a Collaboration (with a capital
>C)
>> ...it is not an individual work...it is also a progression that
>began
>> with dsotm 1...try playing them all back-to-back for a taste of what
>that
>> means...granted, each one of the dsotm discs gives more latitude to
>one
>> of the collaborators...thats why, imo, the first two are more
>> "schulzian"
>
>What amazes me about the 1st two is that they couldn't be bothered to
>change the delay settings over the entire course of their
>collaBOREation.
>Also, there are several places where Namlook's VCS3 is badly out of
>tune.
>I guess people are used to such laziness from Namlook, though.
>Quantity,
>not quality.
so lets see: 2 shit releases out of over 200...about 1%...wish i had that
kinda lazy track record...
tom w
np: namlook V