quoted 13 lines o}why categorize?
>
> >
> >o}why categorize?
> >
> >i think you may have misunderstood. he is suggesting new *non-music*
> >categories--categories for useful/interesting idm resources, not new
> >musical sub-genres. the former i think is a good idea, the latter i
> >agree
> >is unnecessary.
> >
> >rs.
>
> again, the question remains: why categorize? in any way shape or form?
Cause we like to talk about things with other people. And when I ask
somebody what is a party going to be like i'd rather they tell me
techno, then "stuff sort of like that Aphex guy spins but not so much
of those beats from that One Song with the 'Amen Brother' riff in it.
labels is how we's communicate. I'm glad that each time I talk to
someone I don't have to establish the semantics of all terms
pertaining to our discussion.
quoted 6 lines sorry 2 b difficult,
> sorry 2 b difficult,
>
> tom w
>
> np: in the court of the crimson king (category?)
>
freshie
Paranoia: The choice of a Tech Generation
http://silly.com/~tang