On Fri, 02 May 1997, The Rare Guy <buh@clark.net> wrote:
quoted 5 lines the AP article. Chemical Brothers... Orb... FSOL... same old boring suspects.>>the AP article. Chemical Brothers... Orb... FSOL... same old boring suspects.
>
>FSOL boring? not imho. and if you read the above you notice he says they
>DIDN'T JUST TALK about big names like Orbital and FSOL, ie: they talked
>about others too.
same old boring suspects as in 'aren't we bored of seeing the same names over
and over and over in all these magazines?'. i wasn't suggesting that the music
these artists make is boring or devoid of merit
. . . that would be another issue/can of worms altogether. ;-)
quoted 7 lines changed. any effort to give props and support to the REAL electronic>>changed. any effort to give props and support to the REAL electronic
>>revolutionaries was basically ignored or, worse, resented.
>
>FSOL *is* one of the REAL electronic revolutionaries, and so is ?-ziq,
>vibert and pusher, all which were focused on in the article. if you deny
>that at least ?-ziq, vibert and pusher are revolutionaries, then well then I
>reckon I'll just shut up, instead of argueing bigtime ;)
two separate situations here. i'm talking about reviews and features in this
sentence, NOT the electronica feature. would they let me review _Feed Me Weird
Things_? no. _Drum & Bass for Papa_? no. how about little pieces on Vibert or
Jenkinson? uh ... no. no. no. no. the revolutionaries don't warrant page space.
oh, but watch the Plug/D&B4P coverage flood those pages once the Nothing reissue
hits the streets and promo stacks. . .
GuerillaG2-G4/ gg