On Wednesday, 02-Apr-97, Mikko Karvonen wrote [about Re: (idm) Gonzi's and
cspot's final sign of the impending Apoca]:
quoted 1 line I only said IDM cos I'm not sure is Daft Punk electronica.
>>I only said IDM cos I'm not sure is Daft Punk electronica.quoted 2 lines why do you have to put all the music in some cathegory? I just bought Jimi
>why do you have to put all the music in some cathegory? I just bought Jimi
>Tenor's intervision and imho it's not "electronica" or "IDM" just because
it's
quoted 1 line on warp.. it's actually pretty boring and easy-to-listen music. well that's
>on warp.. it's actually pretty boring and easy-to-listen music. well that's
my
quoted 1 line first impression, should listen to it more
>first impression, should listen to it more
It's the title of this list :) I think everyone puts music into categories
for some reason or other, whether they say you shouldn't or not. (ie:
jungle, drum'n'bass and why you shoulnd't call it jungle, ambient, ambient
techno) In fact, I've found myself lately being forced to 'label' it in
order to identify it :p
I thought Intervision one of the best albums I've heard this year :)
--
__
__\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES (aka Rare Guy)
/ /_\ \
http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html
\_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> >
,
m7=
inducing mindwaves.. electronic techno muuusik controlled
manually by a p h e x t wi n .. .. . . .