179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Paul Middleton
To:
idm-owner , kent
Cc:
idm
Date:
Fri, 02 Feb 96 08:49:00 PST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance
Msg-Id:
<31124125@smtp.nla.gov.au>
Mbox:
idm.9602.gz
----------
quoted 19 lines From: idm-owner>From: idm-owner >To: kent >Cc: idm >Subject: Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance >Date: Thursday, February 01, 1996 6:02PM > > >> Chemical Brothers hard to find? That's disheartening > >And unbelievable too, since probably the Hell freezes >over, before we can finally get rid of them! ;) > >Who else thinks that the Bros have gotten away with an >ingenious scam by making totally similar-sounding >records, with the same *jaded* hip-hop/electro/acid samples >every fucking time, and getting them all to charts; not >to talk about making it to the cover of every bleeding >"indie" and trendspotter magazine... >
No.
quoted 5 lines The ChemBros are The Monkees of techno, though I>The ChemBros are The Monkees of techno, though I >actually liked the Monkees ;) So that's only how I can >enjoy them: as the stupid fun they can be, when they >reach their best ;) >
The Monkees of techno? This as a form of comparison seems a bit odd.
quoted 3 lines The brothers gonna work it out - and laugh all the way>The brothers gonna work it out - and laugh all the way >to bank! ;) >
Oh, is that what it's all about is it?
quoted 2 lines ERkki>ERkki >when you laugh, they can't kill you
I'm not so sure!
quoted 3 lines trerra@uta.fi>trerra@uta.fi > >