179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Eylon Israeli
Cc:
,
Date:
Sat, 18 Mar 1995 12:18:06 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: Forward Thoughts
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PTX.3.91.950318120011.5259A-100000@ccs.nslsilus.org>
In-Reply-To:
<xDqQlKgSSK1B068yn@actcom.co.il>
Mbox:
idm.9503.gz
On Sat, 18 Mar 1995, Eylon Israeli wrote:
quoted 1 line Can you elaborate a bit on this VL-1?> Can you elaborate a bit on this VL-1?
If I'm thinking of the right machine...this thing, first of all, is quite expensive: roughly $6K as I recall. It's sole purpose is to do physical modelling of wind instruments. You specify things like what the reed is made from, the length and diameter of the instrument, what the body is made from, and so forth. And by sophisticated mathematical magic, it synthesizes it. I studied electronic and computer music at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Analyzing and recreating the sounds of acoustic instruments (and voice) was an area people were working on deeply. I heard, for example, a computer program that modelled a trumpet, and one that did an amazing sub-bass human voice. This may seem like a purely academic exercise--and to some extent it is. But being able to realistically recreate the sound of existing acoustic instruments leads the way toward understanding exactly how these instruments behave: how the timbre changes as the instrument is played softly and loudly, how it behaves over the range of the instrument, etc. One goal would be the ability to accurately synthesize the sound of a physical object that would be impractical or practically impossible to make in reality. Fifty foot steel hammer smashing down on Stonehenge. A contrabassoon made from aluminum. Etc.