179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Laurent Knauth
To:
Kahgyt
Cc:
Rjyan Kidwell , David Seruyange , idm
Date:
Thu, 5 May 2022 23:27:16 +0200
Subject:
Re: DDM Exists right?
Msg-Id:
<CAA4Z3irzyOUMEmryDR8Hjg20rnZRLYB=ri_PCtTpynpj3X2Ddw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CAFx=wd6vbaMfOT+MNdNtLVFY0_Hem9eNRG_LYwGSc1z8KaNJyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2022-05.gz
The « jazz » statement seems like the « electronic music » compulsory figure. I mean any Roland-based dumb track always claimed some doubtful jazz legacy. But making jazz takes more than striking a 7th chord or shuffling a MIDI clip. « Classically trained » ? Richard Devine and Kirk Degiorgio come to mind, however formal training doesn't sound like the IDM™ to my ears. I didn't comment on the praises i've read here about Mike Paradinas a few days ago, but this is nauseous breakbeat-opportunistic piss-poor polyphony to me (i had the right to remain silent and, as you can tell, i used it wisely). Not everybody is Kettel. If IDM is « classically trained », would you say that « classic dance music » is not ? Quite the opposite, in my opinion. More often than not, « electronic music » seems to seek some respectability, much like spoiled children shitty « house producers » from the 90s wanted to appear as the next Berry Gordy. « Justified and ancient », as the KLF used to say. Do jazz musicians claim that they achieve counterpoint mastery ? Hell no, they humbly play their part (which incidentally takes up all of their lifetime). I've always found that ubiquitous « techno-jazz » statement embarrassing — or is it just marketing ? I must admit that this SONCAS <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SONCAS> discovery was quite questioning to me. Are we just hipsters ? I don't think so. But i find the « electronic music » inability to face up to itself quite worrying. Time will sort it out. On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:34 PM Kahgyt <khoogyra@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 31 lines I thought IDM being labelled Intelligent Dance Music was a misnomer and> I thought IDM being labelled Intelligent Dance Music was a misnomer and > that most in the community agreed it was a toxic way to view the art. As > far as I'm concerned IDM is just that, and doesn't translate to anything > else. > > To me IDM is basically jazz electronica, as in, people who were often > classically trained and/or understood music theory and made electronica. > > On Tue., May 3, 2022, 9:24 a.m. Rjyan Kidwell, <cexwell@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh man is somebody gonna tell her about tigerbeat6 >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2022, 6:49 AM Laurent Knauth <laurent.knauth@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Funnily, she doesn't seem to realise that her music genre might not >>> exist if IDM hadn't been there in the first place *(out of the >>> country).* >>> Unless that is (more likely) some poor polemic attempt in order to get >>> her music heard. >>> I don't blame her, however i think she should try to look above instead. >>> >>> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:27 AM David Seruyange <g3scom@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Reference: https://twitter.com/lilbadsnacks/status/1521155495419162626 >>>> >>>> I thought it was called "Happy Hardcore". >>>> >>>> - David >>>> >>>