179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: IDM 2.8

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-03-11 04:01Re: IDM 2.8
└─ 1994-03-11 18:03Jon Drukman Re: IDM 2.8
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-03-11 04:01808STATE@delphi.comJ. Druman's review of "Rising High Trance Injection Instinct EX 265-2": "My only complaint
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 10 Mar 1994 23:01:37 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: IDM 2.8
permalink · <01H9TOGM7Z1M91VYXQ@delphi.com>
J. Druman's review of "Rising High Trance Injection Instinct EX 265-2": "My only complaint would be the inclusion of the Dreamfish and Irresistible Force tracks on disc 2 as both of them are rather long and the albums from which they are taken are out on Instinct already anyway." For those who do not wish to shell out the money to purchase Dreamfish, or Irresistible Force, then it certainly makes sense to include these tracks. After all, this is a sampler. Just because you already have the discs means Instinct shoudln't put them on their samplers? 8080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808 0 Paul Rafanello Internet: 808STATE@DELPHI.COM 0 8080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808
1994-03-11 18:03Jon Drukmanpaul rafanello quotes my review: > "My only complaint would be the inclusion of the Dreamf
From:
Jon Drukman
To:
Date:
Fri, 11 Mar 94 10:03:31 PST
Subject:
Re: IDM 2.8
Reply to:
Re: IDM 2.8
permalink · <9403111803.AA14036@dlsun87.us.oracle.com>
paul rafanello quotes my review:
quoted 3 lines "My only complaint would be the inclusion of the Dreamfish and> "My only complaint would be the inclusion of the Dreamfish and >Irresistible Force tracks on disc 2 as both of them are rather long and the >albums from which they are taken are out on Instinct already anyway."
and comments:
quoted 4 lines For those who do not wish to shell out the money to purchase Dreamfish, or> For those who do not wish to shell out the money to purchase Dreamfish, or >Irresistible Force, then it certainly makes sense to include these tracks. >After all, this is a sampler. Just because you already have the discs means >Instinct shoudln't put them on their samplers?
i'd rather have some "value added", if you know what i mean. i mean, these tracks that i was complaining about are 15 and 18 minutes long. that's a lot of disc space to waste with stuff that can be easily obtained elsewhere. i wouldn't have minded if they put shorter edits on, just so we can get the idea... i fully planned to buy dreamfish but having a redundant 18 minutes somewhere doesn't excite me. there's a lot of other stuff they could have put there. Jon Drukman jdrukman%dlsun87@oracle.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.