179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Dance music?

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1993-11-09 22:01Christian Bartholdsson Dance music?
1993-11-10 01:35ozymandias G desiderata Re: Dance music?
1993-11-10 02:00Jon Drukman Dance music?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1993-11-09 22:01Christian Bartholdsson>Chapterhouse - Blood Music > >Overall: 9/10. Would be a 10 if not for the overused Zep sa
From:
Christian Bartholdsson
Date:
Tue, 9 Nov 93 23:01:42 +0100
Subject:
Dance music?
quoted 5 lines Chapterhouse - Blood Music>Chapterhouse - Blood Music > >Overall: 9/10. Would be a 10 if not for the overused Zep sample. Lots >of music, incredible production, great songs, and the best use of >techno forms in a "pop" album in this boy's reckoning. Ranks even
Interesting. I gave this record 2/10 in my magazine review. IMHO, it's terrible. My favourite "progressive shoegazers" (wahey!) are Seefeel. They just released their first album "Quique" and *that's* what I call mindblowing.
quoted 4 lines that reminds me, didn't the u.k. edition of the spiritualized album>that reminds me, didn't the u.k. edition of the spiritualized album >on CD come with a bonus disc containing an ambient interpretation of >the whole album? does anyone on this list have it? care to describe >or review it?
What?! I've never heard of that. "Lazer Guided Melodies"? (great album, btw) - chris@minsk.docs.uu.se
1993-11-10 01:35ozymandias G desiderataHey, Christian... I worship Seefeel as well, but I wouldn't call them shoegazey _at_ _all_
From:
ozymandias G desiderata
Date:
Tue, 09 Nov 93 18:35:13 -0700
Subject:
Re: Dance music?
Hey, Christian... I worship Seefeel as well, but I wouldn't call them shoegazey _at_ _all_. In fact, I wouldn't even call them a techno offshoot. They're far more out there than that. I think of them as a :zoviet- france: with traditional instrumentation. Yeah, they get technoey, and they get poppy, but that doesn't really seem like that's what they're reaching for. Nobody on Too Pure seems to be trying to be really much of anything, but I suppose that's getting a bit too non-IDM. I meant what I said in my review -- I really feel that Chapterhouse is the best fusion of _pop_ music with techno sensibilities that I've heard so far. I guess it helps that I was an avid Chapterhouse fan to begin with, but I've heard my share of attempts towards fusion of pop and techno before, and most of them were godawful. It seems to me that Chapterhouse and Drum Club are working towards the same aim from opposite directions, but I suppose there are those of you out there who would say that doesn't help Chapterhouse much. I dunno, I just know that I _really_ like this CD. Which of course puts this in the matter of opinion, and so makes it a pointless thing to argue about, but I just thought I'd make one attempt at clarification. Talk to y'all later! DJ AladdinSane
1993-11-10 02:00Jon Drukman"ozymandias G desiderata" <ogd@selway.umt.edu>: > I worship Seefeel as well, but I wouldn'
From:
Jon Drukman
Date:
Tue, 9 Nov 93 18:00:53 PST
Subject:
Dance music?
"ozymandias G desiderata" <ogd@selway.umt.edu>:
quoted 6 lines I worship Seefeel as well, but I wouldn't call them shoegazey> I worship Seefeel as well, but I wouldn't call them shoegazey >_at_ _all_. In fact, I wouldn't even call them a techno offshoot. >They're far more out there than that. I think of them as a :zoviet- >france: with traditional instrumentation. Yeah, they get technoey, and >they get poppy, but that doesn't really seem like that's what they're >reaching for.
thank god somebody else agrees with me. (i had this exact same debate with christian the other day - seefeel are about as shoegazey as the ultraviolet catastrophe...) Jon Drukman jdrukman%dlsun87@oracle.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.