IDM Mailing Archive

quoted 4 lines Oi !

>> Oi ! >> But have you heard the Rat Relocation Project? > > Many times.

I've own it, and have listened to it more than a few times. >> If so, did you try and suffer through it more than

quoted 3 lines once?

>> once? > > It's phenomenal. Much better than the film Solaris.

I forced myself to listen to it past the first complete listen, hoping to find something else. alas, I found nothing but a shallow piece of work outside of the actual concept. Solaris on the other hand Is an absolute fucking masterpiece in every way and one of my favorite films of all time. the criterion version is worth every penny and I suggest you give it another chance after reading some more insight as to what Tarkovsky and Lem were trying to say with their versions of this mindblowing book/film.

quoted 4 lines Matmos is as Matmos does but how does something

>> Matmos is as Matmos does but how does something >> like this get released? > > It's part of a series of similar stuff, and most of it's pretty good stuff.

here I partially agree, it's mostly decent stuff for what they're trying to achieve, this work in particular I felt was an afterthought past the liner notes.

quoted 4 lines And what made me think I'd

>> And what made me think I'd >> like it after reading the description? > > Drew Daniel writes good publicity?

drew daniel is very photogenic naked. -kiya --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org

dude, tarkowski and lem wanted to say completely different things. that's why Lem was mad when he saw the way his book was about to be used for other purposes than its own. anyway, this is strongly off-topic. kiya iamacopier babzani wrote:

quoted 67 lines Oi !

>>>Oi ! >>>But have you heard the Rat Relocation Project? >>> >>> >>Many times. >> >> > >I've own it, and have listened to it more than a few times. > > > >> If so, did you try and suffer through it more than > > >>>once? >>> >>> >> >>It's phenomenal. Much better than the film Solaris. >> >> > >I forced myself to listen to it past the first complete listen, hoping to >find something else. alas, I found nothing but a shallow piece of work >outside of the actual concept. >Solaris on the other hand Is an absolute fucking masterpiece in every way >and one of my favorite films of all time. the criterion version is worth >every penny and I suggest you give it another chance after reading some more >insight as to what Tarkovsky and Lem were trying to say with their versions >of this mindblowing book/film. > > > >>>Matmos is as Matmos does but how does something >>>like this get released? >>> >>> >>It's part of a series of similar stuff, and most of it's pretty good stuff. >> >> > >here I partially agree, it's mostly decent stuff for what they're trying to >achieve, this work in particular I felt was an afterthought past the liner >notes. > > > >>>And what made me think I'd >>>like it after reading the description? >>> >>> >>Drew Daniel writes good publicity? >> >> > >drew daniel is very photogenic naked. > >-kiya > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > >

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org

quoted 3 lines dude, tarkowski and lem wanted to say completely different things.

> dude, tarkowski and lem wanted to say completely different things. > that's why Lem was mad when he saw the way his book was about to be used > for other purposes than its own. anyway, this is strongly off-topic.

did you not read what I wrote? I clipped it for you below so you can reread it. notice the word "versions"? I fully understand the difference in what Lem meant by writing the book the way he did, Tarkovsky took Solaris expanded on it in a direction that Lem didn't agree with, that's why Lem raised such a stink about it. He couldn't handle seeing his own work being twisted for a film. Regardless, both of their versions are amazing in their own way. :) -kiya

quoted 8 lines I forced myself to listen to it past the first complete listen, hoping to

>> I forced myself to listen to it past the first complete listen, hoping to >> find something else. alas, I found nothing but a shallow piece of work >> outside of the actual concept. >> Solaris on the other hand Is an absolute fucking masterpiece in every way >> and one of my favorite films of all time. the criterion version is worth >> every penny and I suggest you give it another chance after reading some more >> insight as to what Tarkovsky and Lem were trying to say with their versions >> of this mindblowing book/film.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org

On Tuesday, October 19, 2004, at 09:55 PM, kiya iamacopier babzani wrote:

quoted 9 lines And what made me think I'd

>>> And what made me think I'd >>> like it after reading the description? >> >> Drew Daniel writes good publicity? > > drew daniel is very photogenic naked. > > -kiya >

So I'm not the only one who read that interview in BUTT. =] Luis P.S. It's a real magazine. I swear. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org

quoted 10 lines And what made me think I'd

>>>> And what made me think I'd >>>> like it after reading the description? >>> >>> Drew Daniel writes good publicity? >> >> drew daniel is very photogenic naked. >> >> -kiya >> > So I'm not the only one who read that interview in BUTT. =]

actually, if you go to Aquarius Records in san francisco.. there is a 4"x 6" picture of drew behind the counter. he's naked. with the exception of a plastic fish with a hole in the top, and his genitals are stuffed into the plastic fish. it's so the fish catches all his sweat as he's dancing at the gay club he used to dance at for money. :) -kiya --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org

On Tuesday, October 19, 2004, at 10:54 PM, kiya iamacopier babzani wrote:

quoted 21 lines And what made me think I'd

>>>>> And what made me think I'd >>>>> like it after reading the description? >>>> >>>> Drew Daniel writes good publicity? >>> >>> drew daniel is very photogenic naked. >>> >>> -kiya >>> >> So I'm not the only one who read that interview in BUTT. =] > > actually, if you go to Aquarius Records in san francisco.. > there is a 4"x 6" picture of drew behind the counter. > he's naked. with the exception of a plastic fish with a hole in the > top, > and his genitals are stuffed into the plastic fish. > it's so the fish catches all his sweat as he's dancing at the gay club > he > used to dance at for money. > :) >

Ah yes. Vice magazine has a copy of this picture in one of their online articles (search for "Matmos' teabagging days"). Don't ask me how I know this. Anyway, the pics in BUTT are of DD and MCS giving the full monty in their hotel room sometime around the endstages of A Civil War. The interview is more interesting (honestly), but you can't pass up the puerile amusement of seeing (idm) celebrities naked. tappity-tap, Luis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org