179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion

6 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: braindance · braindance / fusion
2004-03-01 01:34Re: [idm] Re: braindance
└─ 2004-03-01 04:59chthonic streams Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
└─ 2004-03-01 09:08theREALmxyzptlk Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
└─ 2004-03-01 09:11theREALmxyzptlk Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
2004-03-01 12:10Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
2004-03-01 20:09Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2004-03-01 01:34DJSTiK420@aol.comi just thought of another word that i suppose means the same..... Fusion. there ya go... b
From:
To:
,
Date:
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:34:20 EST
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance
permalink · <30.512cf77e.2d73ed1c@aol.com>
i just thought of another word that i suppose means the same..... Fusion. there ya go... braindance or fusion. i suppose im just a big rephlex fan. HAHA. people look at me like im psycho when they ask what kind of music i make and i say braindance. cheers. d In a message dated 2/29/2004 7:25:32 PM Central Standard Time, info@noiseloop.com writes: whatever happened to the term braindance(combination of every and all
quoted 1 line styles)?> > styles)?
It's a piece of marketing, that's all. I never heard anybody use it in real life.
2004-03-01 04:59chthonic streamsDJSTiK420@aol.com >i just thought of another word that i suppose means the same..... Fusio
From:
chthonic streams
To:
Date:
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:59:52 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance
permalink · <p05210602bc6872ea7e1b@[64.63.223.102]>
DJSTiK420@aol.com
quoted 3 lines i just thought of another word that i suppose means the same..... Fusion.>i just thought of another word that i suppose means the same..... Fusion. >there ya go... braindance or fusion. i suppose im just a big rephlex >fan. HAHA.
fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a certain type of groove-based jazz-rock. it differs from prog in that prog seems to have longer and multi-part song structures and has an emphasis on classical scales and modes, through there's sometimes jazz thrown in as well. i can't name any fusion bands off the top of my head, but i know they exist(ed). d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-03-01 09:08theREALmxyzptlk> >fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a certain >type of groov
From:
theREALmxyzptlk
To:
chthonic streams ,
Date:
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 04:08:34 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
permalink · <6.0.3.0.2.20040301040512.01d59ac8@mail.comcast.net>
quoted 7 lines fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a certain> >fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a certain >type of groove-based jazz-rock. it differs from prog in that prog seems >to have longer and multi-part song structures and has an emphasis on >classical scales and modes, through there's sometimes jazz thrown in as >well. i can't name any fusion bands off the top of my head, but i know >they exist(ed).
Weather Report, Return To Forever, Mahavishnu Orchestra, Headhunters and a ton of other (often ex-Miles players) ensembles. More than "sometimes jazz thrown in", the category was mainly a fusion between jazz with rock. jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-03-01 09:11theREALmxyzptlkAt 04:08 AM 3/1/2004, theREALmxyzptlk wrote: >>fusion is a word that's already been used l
From:
theREALmxyzptlk
To:
chthonic streams ,
Date:
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 04:11:48 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
permalink · <6.0.3.0.2.20040301041055.01d3bd08@mail.comcast.net>
At 04:08 AM 3/1/2004, theREALmxyzptlk wrote:
quoted 13 lines fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a certain>>fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a certain >>type of groove-based jazz-rock. it differs from prog in that prog seems >>to have longer and multi-part song structures and has an emphasis on >>classical scales and modes, through there's sometimes jazz thrown in as >>well. i can't name any fusion bands off the top of my head, but i know >>they exist(ed). > >Weather Report, Return To Forever, Mahavishnu Orchestra, Headhunters and a >ton of other (often ex-Miles players) ensembles. More than "sometimes jazz >thrown in", the category was mainly a fusion between jazz with rock. > > >jeff
And come to think of it, what Miles was playing in those days was also considered fusion. jeff (again - talking to myself) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-03-01 12:10Doopeyduk@aol.comactually, miles is credited as starting the fusion thing with 'bitches brew' (largely as a
From:
To:
, ,
Date:
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 07:10:02 EST
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
permalink · <124.2b91ce52.2d74821a@aol.com>
actually, miles is credited as starting the fusion thing with 'bitches brew' (largely as a result of his fascination/brief friendship with hendrix). and - again demonstrating the limitations of musical categories - a lot of "fusion" was exactly that - with musicians drawing from jazz, classical, rock and anything else. in fact, if "prog rock" describes music that fuses rock's timbres and instruments with classical structures, then a lot of fusion (david sancious, jan hammer, lifetime, al dimeola ,chick corea jean-luc ponty) was actually prog. The only distinction was that it was executed by people with sigificantly more technique than your average prog rocker. t
2004-03-01 20:09saltimbocca@gmx.de> i can't name any fusion bands off the top of > my head, but i know they exist(ed). Miles
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:09:47 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: braindance / fusion
permalink · <6348F274-6BBC-11D8-9213-000393C80624@gmx.de>
quoted 2 lines i can't name any fusion bands off the top of> i can't name any fusion bands off the top of > my head, but i know they exist(ed).
Miles probably started it all - "Bitches Brew", "Agharta" and other 70s albums, then Weather Report (who in their own right would be worthy of discussion on this list b/c of Jaco's influence on Tom Jenkinson), Mahavishnu Orchestra ... all those followed in the 80s by Chick Corea's Electric Band, Allan Holdsworth, and a truckload others. Nowadays, Fusion has become synonymous with boring muzak-style music by virtuoso players who somehow have no taste (not just my opinion). Anyway, I think Braindance is a wicked term for this kind of musick they call IDM around here. :-) Just listening to Black Dog's Bytes - what a wonderful record - you can still hear traces of the 80s in it I think I think this message board rules! good fun to post and read here.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org