179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] ovalprocess - a review

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-08-22 03:56William VanLoo [idm] ovalprocess - a review
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-08-22 03:56William VanLooMy god, this new Oval record is good. After 3 or 4 listens, I've come to the conclusion th
From:
William VanLoo
To:
microsound
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:56:08 -0700
Subject:
[idm] ovalprocess - a review
permalink · <39A1F9D8.40E8C307@mediaone.net>
My god, this new Oval record is good. After 3 or 4 listens, I've come to the conclusion that "ovalprocess" is really, really good. I've been in love with "systemisch" since I got it (spring of 1999; I was late to the glitch party), and I had mixed feelings about a new Oval record. The "szenario" 12" dissappointed me with its barely-there nature and overly harsh sound design (for my tastes, anyway). My anticipation for a new full-length, then, was tempered with uncertainty towards the new direction that Markus Popp would take. I'm pleased to report that, while "ovalprocess" is certainly more harsh that much of "systemisch", that it retains much of the warmth and organic sound. "systemisch" starts off lovely and delicate, and grows in levels of soft distortion (to quote Bjork) until the end, when it has a gorgeously torn quality to it, like the ragged and burned edges of paper left in a fire. "ovalprocess" starts off harsh and somewhat off-putting, but then proceeds to let the beauty show through as the tracks go by, allowing a warm glitched organ or delicate bell-tone into the mix. A friend of mine, who became a huge Oval fan after I lent him "systemisch" and "diskont94", immediately raved about the use of feedback as a primary element in "ovalprocess", and he's right. Popp is using pitched feedback to great effect as pads, leads or other melodic elements. The thought I'm left with about "ovalprocess" is that, for all his talk about theory and process being more important than result, that Markus Popp's result is still worth listening to. Maybe that's a validation of the refinement his process has undergone since he started working with digital sound design, maybe it's just that he makes great music in spite of the theory behind it. I'm not sure which it is. To me, however, the overwhelming sense I get from "ovalprocess" is that Markus Popp wants to make beautiful music, but can't stand "pure" beauty - it has to come with all the flaws, dirt, and digital cruft that one encounters in everyday life. This is truly modern music, in both the good and bad senses of the word "modern". --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org