179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Fwd: Re: (idm) More PROPS on Namlook

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-12-06 01:05(idm) Fwd: Re: (idm) More PROPS on Namlook
1999-12-06 02:10Mxyzptlk Re: (idm) Fwd: Re: (idm) More PROPS on Namlook
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-12-06 01:05gregh69@webtv.net
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 17:05:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) Fwd: Re: (idm) More PROPS on Namlook
permalink · <23264-384B0BE4-17143@storefull-244.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
(no text content — attachments only)
1999-12-06 02:10Mxyzptlkduck. gregh69@webtv.net wrote: > Most of these electronic "bands" today suck! they do not
From:
Mxyzptlk
To:
Date:
Sun, 05 Dec 1999 20:10:56 -0600
Subject:
Re: (idm) Fwd: Re: (idm) More PROPS on Namlook
permalink · <384B1B2F.90E2114D@flash.net>
duck. gregh69@webtv.net wrote:
quoted 6 lines Most of these electronic "bands" today suck! they do not understand> Most of these electronic "bands" today suck! they do not understand > synths worth a $hit! Namlook can actually read music and play a synth, > not just use the presets! how many of today's electronic music composers > can actually use a BIG MOOG MODULAR SYSTEM!? and understand it!? very > few! enough said... >
jeff "10,000 people all screaming the same thing at the same time are wrong, even if they're right." dancing/about/architecture "...with wandering steps and slow..." ICQ904008 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org