Well, I think the CZ101 is actually quite cool. I never read the original post
so I'm not totally up on what this thread is all about. Are you saying that you
bought a CZ101 because someone said that BOC used one? I can see that. Although
the trend in electronic music has been to use old analog synths, it's not that
only way to make cool sounds. In fact, I'm a getting little sick of all the
hoop'la going on about them. I love analogs and all that but now stuff is sort
of starting to all sound the same. Don't forget that the reason people started
using analog again in the first place is that every one ealse was using Digital
synths. By the way, I hear a lot of Yamaha type FM all over Ae's records that
could also be made by the CZ as well...
-=GB=-
Adam Hodgins wrote:
quoted 18 lines I was told cz-101 by a few others on different email lists I'm on. So I
> I was told cz-101 by a few others on different email lists I'm on. So I
> vote casio, but I haven't played with either so what good is my opinion :)
> L8R...
> Adam
>
> >I'm confused now. I thought the original poster was referring to the
> >Roland SH-101, not the Casio. It's weird that this comes up though, because
> >I bought a Casio CZ-101 last week on ebay, based on information I had heard
> >that it makes some EXTREMELY odd sounds. (And also has a tendency to change
> >the parameters on patches by itself if it is unplugged for two long,
> >producing crazy sounds which go beyond editable levels).
> >However, I tend to think it's a SH-101 merely for the fact that I had
> >always thought of the BOC sound as very analog sounding, which the Roland
> >is and the Casio is not....
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org