179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Incoming! gone bust ??

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-03-11 17:39Irene McC (idm) Incoming! gone bust ??
└─ 1999-03-11 17:54Greg Clow Re: (idm) Incoming! gone bust ??
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-11 17:39Irene McCGrapevine news has it that the Incoming! label has gone PHUT. True or false? I *
From:
Irene McC
To:
Date:
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:39:26 +0200
Subject:
(idm) Incoming! gone bust ??
permalink · <E10L9Rp-0008yO-00@smtp02.iafrica.com>
Grapevine news has it that the Incoming! label has gone PHUT. True or false? I *
1999-03-11 17:54Greg ClowOn Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Irene McC wrote: > Grapevine news has it that the Incoming! label has
From:
Greg Clow
To:
Date:
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:54:13 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Incoming! gone bust ??
Reply to:
(idm) Incoming! gone bust ??
permalink · <Pine.BSI.3.96r.990311125319.10842A-100000@shell1.interlog.com>
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Irene McC wrote:
quoted 3 lines Grapevine news has it that the Incoming! label has gone PHUT.> Grapevine news has it that the Incoming! label has gone PHUT. > > True or false?
My last couple of emails to them bounced with a message talling me the user no longer existed. So it's possible. Greg