179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?

5 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-01-27 05:52icarus m wright (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
└─ 1999-01-27 23:18Jeremiah T. Isaacs Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
└─ 1999-01-28 00:43Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
└─ 1999-01-28 17:41brian Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
1999-01-27 21:19Marc 3 Poirier Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-01-27 05:52icarus m wrightHas anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's most powerful syn
From:
icarus m wright
To:
Date:
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 00:52:13 -0500
Subject:
(idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
permalink · <19990127.005215.-3198681.0.Icarusmwright@juno.com>
Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's most powerful synth engine that no-one ever uses [mostly because making it work is suspiciously like programming]. Also, if anyone's ever used it, what were your opinions of Csound? Has the stand alone box ever appeared, 'cause I've never found one? {last year some time I read smething about some company porting it to a Harvard supercomputer chipset.} ~I~ ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
1999-01-27 23:18Jeremiah T. IsaacsOn Wed, 27 Jan 1999, icarus m wright wrote: > Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may q
From:
Jeremiah T. Isaacs
To:
icarus m wright
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:18:37 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
Reply to:
(idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
permalink · <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901270952050.23550-100000@schultz.io.com>
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, icarus m wright wrote:
quoted 10 lines Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's> Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's > most powerful synth engine that no-one ever uses [mostly because making > it work is suspiciously like programming]. Also, if anyone's ever used > it, what were your opinions of Csound? Has the stand alone box ever > appeared, 'cause I've never found one? {last year some time I read > smething about some company porting it to a Harvard supercomputer > chipset.} > > > ~I~
there is a _port_ of csound to Be, but it is just that, a port. AFAIK it isnt multithreaded or changed to take advantage of Be system architecture. doing so would/will take a lot of work. available at http://www.be.com/beware/Audio/Csound.html opinions on csound: there is this curve of capability versus complication, where they mutually increase one another. csound is the ugliest most amazing sound software you can use. (imo). i love it. -- ------------------------------ jti@io.com http://www.io.com/~jti/ http://www.sonictherapy.com/fluoroscopic/fk.html ------------------------------------------------ --
1999-01-28 00:43bloch@verdurin.freeserve.co.ukRe. Csound: There is a graphical interface to Csound called Cecilia. Unix only, though, I
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:43:07 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
permalink · <19990128004307.A344@marcel.net>
Re. Csound: There is a graphical interface to Csound called Cecilia. Unix only, though, I believe. adam
1999-01-28 17:41briancecilia for mac also exists. .. brian rachielles audio/kcsb 91.9 fm santa barbara http://w
From:
brian
To:
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
permalink · <Pine.SUN.4.05.9901280940530.21320-100000@coyote.rain.org>
cecilia for mac also exists. .. brian rachielles audio/kcsb 91.9 fm santa barbara http://www.rain.org/~audio On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 bloch@verdurin.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
quoted 8 lines Re. Csound:> Re. Csound: > > There is a graphical interface to Csound called Cecilia. Unix only, > though, I believe. > > adam > >
1999-01-27 21:19Marc 3 Poirier> Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's > most powerful
From:
Marc 3 Poirier
To:
Cc:
icarus m wright
Date:
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:19:06 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) if Csound and BEOs had childeren?
permalink · <3.0.5.32.19990127161906.0079eb30@virtu.sar.usf.edu>
quoted 4 lines Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's> Has anyone ported Csound to Be? Csound may quite possibly be the world's > most powerful synth engine that no-one ever uses [mostly because making > it work is suspiciously like programming]. Also, if anyone's ever used > it, what were your opinions of Csound?
I don't know what BEOS is, but I use Csound for DOS & Csound for Windows. Basicly, it is more like programming than using a physical synth because you do everything by typing up text files. It can be very slow to get anything done, but you get the more control over what you do & more possibilities than you would with any other approach. I think it's the best for doing things with inputted sound files. There is some really unbelievable stuff you can do to your recordings, & certain common things can be done with much higher accuracy & quality than with other methods, but all of this takes much processing power. Some things I do take hours to compile. These have been my brief thoughts on Csound. Marc Poirier