Sniff.....Sniff, sniff....Damn it!
I gotcha Andrew, but its just too many things on the budget.....and besides
that would cut into my budget of getting music....which isnt a lot now as it
is......Lucky for me people have been helping me out.......And I really
appreciate it.......But I am going to do it......Cuz hey, U guys keep
telling me, and I keep asking, I keep asking and U guys keep telling
me......I gotta break this damn cycle sooner or later! Thanks for the info
fellas.....
Now lets see: Vacation trips, Computer, CDr unit and one T-Table(oh, and
then 500,000 old and new CDs/Vinyl I need....)
Sniff, sniff........Damn!
Broke and overwhelmed, Hk!
-----Original Message-----
From: cognition@ns.sympatico.ca [mailto:cognition@ns.sympatico.ca]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 10:07 AM
To: idm@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (idm) CiM
AFAIK, none of CiM's music is out on CD.
The material on Headspace, Delsin,
and Focus is only out on vinyl. Kelley:
Why don't you buy a record player?
You don't have to go out and buy
a Technics 1200, just go to the local
pawn shop and get a cheap record player
for $20 or so. There's lots of great music
that *is not* available on CD that you're
missing out on because you don't have a
vinyl-player. With so many people CD-obsessed,
record players are *very* easy to find these
days. Andrew Duke
Kelley Hackett wrote:
quoted 6 lines My comments, and I have to apologize to many because it has happened to me
> My comments, and I have to apologize to many because it has happened to me
> on several occasions, the one for Ernie, the message for Brock........the
> sharp change is really what got me, but hey, now I just copy the persons
> name, and then delete the list name.......but again, the change is so
> drastic, on a couple of times I forgot.......My fault........ and since I
> have your attention, give me a Discography of CIM's music.....(thats out
on
quoted 13 lines CD)
> CD)
>
> Hk!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cesium5Hz@aol.com [mailto:Cesium5Hz@aol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 7:43 PM
> To: idm@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (idm) auto reply woes.
>
> In a message dated 9/03/00 6:10:10 jpklein@flash.net writes:
>
> > Whatever you may think about the autoreply (good or bad), Matt is
correct.
quoted 16 lines Replying to sender always used to be *just* to the sender - not to the
> > Replying to sender always used to be *just* to the sender - not to the
> > list.
>
> It has definitely changed beyond the standard, which was previous. 313 and
> Ambient still have the previous reply function. Why the sudden change for
> idm. Who on this list actually likes this change?
>
> A_Zed
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
--
Cognition/Andrew Duke's In The Mix
mailto:cognition@techno.ca
http://techno.ca/cognition
1096 Queen St #123 Halifax NS Canada B3H 2R9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org