179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: re: (idm) Ganger

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
1997-12-14 22:45philip sherburne (idm) Ganger
1997-12-15 21:56daniel re: (idm) Ganger
1997-12-16 19:25Re: re: (idm) Ganger
└─ 1997-12-17 12:22Iain H. Re: re: (idm) Ganger
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-12-14 22:45philip sherburneHas anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on Soulstaticsound? I know Und
From:
philip sherburne
To:
Date:
Sun, 14 Dec 1997 17:45:15 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Ganger
permalink · <v02130500b0ba119b3320@[128.148.19.79]>
Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on Soulstaticsound? I know Underdog did one mix, Two Lone Swordsmen another, and one more by someone called "D" (?). Are any of them worth the $9 for a single track? relentlessly, phil
1997-12-15 21:56danielPhil wrote: >Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on >Soulstaticsou
From:
daniel
To:
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 15 Dec 1997 15:56:34 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
re: (idm) Ganger
permalink · <Pine.BSF.3.96.971215154522.3343A-100000@lestat.daniel.blkbox.com>
Phil wrote:
quoted 4 lines Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on>Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on >Soulstaticsound? I know Underdog did one mix, Two Lone Swordsmen >another,and one more by someone called "D" (?). Are any of them worth >the $9 for a single track?
I have the two lone swordsman remix of this ganger track. And yes it is worth it for one song. Bascially it takes tls's notions of odd sounds, ambience and melodies and applies it to ganger. Very good. One thing I found quite entertaining about it is that the drums sound "real" instead of machine generated. One of tls's better remixes. The etching on the other side is odd cause it kinda plays. Also, note this is supposedly limited to a 500 release pressing <in fact each remix is limited to 500>. -dan
1997-12-16 19:25Martin_Burbridge@3com.comdaniel <daniel@eliteware.com> wrote: >>> Subject: re: (idm) Ganger Phil wrote: >Has anyone
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 16 Dec 1997 14:25:20 -0500
Subject:
Re: re: (idm) Ganger
permalink · <8525656F.0069BCAC.00@hqoutbound.ops.3com.com>
daniel <daniel@eliteware.com> wrote:
quoted 1 line>>>
Subject: re: (idm) Ganger Phil wrote:
quoted 4 lines Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on>Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on >Soulstaticsound? I know Underdog did one mix, Two Lone Swordsmen >another,and one more by someone called "D" (?). Are any of them worth >the $9 for a single track?
I have the two lone swordsman remix of this ganger track. And yes it is worth it for one song. <<< yes, the tls rmx has a whomping bass that makes my puny speakers weep - upgrade release. saw the other 2, anyone got any reccommendations. hate to be totally ignorant but what is ganger? -martin np alt frequencies
1997-12-17 12:22Iain H.>>Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on >>Soulstaticsound? I know
From:
Iain H.
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:22:01 +0000
Subject:
Re: re: (idm) Ganger
Reply to:
Re: re: (idm) Ganger
permalink · <l03110700b0bd72022260@[194.222.156.115]>
quoted 4 lines Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on>>Has anyone heard any of the three 1-sided Ganger remix 12"s on >>Soulstaticsound? I know Underdog did one mix, Two Lone Swordsmen >>another,and one more by someone called "D" (?). Are any of them worth >>the $9 for a single track?
quoted 2 lines I have the two lone swordsman remix of this ganger track. And yes it is>I have the two lone swordsman remix of this ganger track. And yes it is >worth it for one song.
quoted 5 lines yes, the tls rmx has a whomping bass that makes my puny speakers weep ->yes, the tls rmx has a whomping bass that makes my puny speakers weep - >upgrade release. saw the other 2, anyone got any reccommendations. hate to >be totally ignorant but what is ganger? > >-martin
Ganger are sometimes great, sometimes somewhat misguided, Scottish exponents of Tortoise/Ui (amongst others) style minimal post rock. Some records I've heard have been a total trip for the entire duration, some just don't grab me at all. People often point a 'krautrock' finger in these band's direction but the last time I was in Germany I heard a good few positive mentions about Ganger - so they must be doing something right :) They recently got a new rhythm section (courtesy Les Tinglies) I believe and the most recent stuff I've heard (I don't know if it's out, I was lucky enough to hear it in the studio where they recorded it in Edinburgh) was definitely a step in the right direction. Rubyjune. ---- <http://www.rjune.demon.co.uk/>