179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?

7 messages · 6 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-04-03 19:29Brett McCormick (idm) chem bros movie?!?
1997-04-04 04:02Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
├─ 1997-04-03 22:50Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc] Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
├─ 1997-04-04 04:05a lifeform Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
└─ 1997-04-04 13:54The Rare Guy Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
1997-04-04 05:53Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
1997-04-04 16:36Lazlo Nibble Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-04-03 19:29Brett McCormickweirdness... ------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ------- From: "Jov
From:
Brett McCormick
To:
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <199704031929.LAA10620@speedy.speakeasy.org>
weirdness... ------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ------- From: "Jovian F." <jfrancey@orca.bc.ca> Sender: nw-raves-owner@hyperreal.com To: nw-raves@hyperreal.com Subject: chem bros? Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 19:51:31 -0800 Return-Path: nw-raves-owner@hyperreal.com Received: from taz.hyperreal.com (taz.hyperreal.com [204.152.144.36]) by eyeball.speakeasy.org (8.8.0/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA12708 for <brett@eyeball.speakeasy.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:54:20 -0800 Received: (qmail 9594 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 1997 03:52:02 -0000 Delivered-To: nw-raves@qmail.hyperreal.com Received: (qmail 9592 invoked by uid 1); 3 Apr 1997 03:52:01 -0000 MBOX-Line: From nw-raves-owner@hyperreal.com Wed Apr 2 19:52:01 1997 Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id TAA09587; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 19:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.reelwest.bc.ca by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with SMTP id TAA09580; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 19:51:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ras2com26.reelwest.bc.ca (unverified [207.194.197.126]) by srv1.reelwest.bc.ca (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id <B0000104173@srv1.reelwest.bc.ca>; Wed, 02 Apr 1997 19:51:31 -0800 Message-ID: <B0000104173@srv1.reelwest.bc.ca> X-Sender: jfrancey@orca.bc.ca X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Okay, for those who don't get MuchMusic, here's some amazing information for ya. The Chemical Bros. (evidently big in Japan) have agreed to appear in a Japanese produced film called "The Chem. Bros. Kick Butt" in which they are imbued with superhuman powers and fight crime. Noel Gallagher turned down the chance for a cameo appearance. Oh yes, this is the future of music. ;) If I'd heard this yesterday I would have thought it was an April Fool. love and harmony - jove - --- watch this space for further self-evident truths ------- end ------- ------- end of forwarded message -------
1997-04-04 04:02cmac@txdirect.netspeaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who thought the chemical
From:
To:
Brett McCormick
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 03 Apr 1997 21:02:26 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <33447D51.146D@txdirect.net>
speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who thought the chemical brothers were pretty good. ah, wrong!!! i told then that they are ripoff artist. basically i told them that the chemsters sucked. same with the prodigy as they mentioned it.
1997-04-03 22:50Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc]Ok I don't really like the chems either but c'mon instead of talking about bands we don't
From:
Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc]
To:
Cc:
Brett McCormick ,
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:50:33 +0000 ()
Subject:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <Pine.BSF.3.95.970403224641.3455C-100000@www.webelite.com>
Ok I don't really like the chems either but c'mon instead of talking about bands we don't like, let's talk about some we do like. I hate to point out the obvious (examplified by the last few posts) but *the IDM list needs some good content*. sorry to use up the bandwidth- Nate On Thu, 3 Apr 1997 cmac@txdirect.net wrote:
quoted 5 lines speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who> speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who > thought the chemical brothers were pretty good. ah, wrong!!! i told > then that they are ripoff artist. basically i told them that the > chemsters sucked. same with the prodigy as they mentioned it. >
Nate Harrison Digital Magician Inc. www.digimagician.com nate@digimagician.com 313.994.7316
1997-04-04 04:05a lifeform> speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who > thought the chem
From:
a lifeform
To:
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 23:05:40 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <199704040405.XAA12875@housing1.stucen.gatech.edu>
quoted 4 lines speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who> speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who > thought the chemical brothers were pretty good. ah, wrong!!! i told > then that they are ripoff artist. basically i told them that the > chemsters sucked. same with the prodigy as they mentioned it.
Really. So, who did you suggest they listen to? np: Boards Of Canada- Everything You Do Is A Balloon. Absolutely wonderful chill-tip number, with a perfect blend of subdued beats, melodic texture, in balance and harmony with each other. Can't wait to get my hands on more new Skam. Jega is tops too. :) -- guyjr@ns.gt.ed.net | I.D.M.- That stage in sleeping when your feet are a.k.a., Guy Elden, Jr. | moving faster than your eyes.
1997-04-04 13:54The Rare GuyOn Friday, 04-Apr-97, cmac@txdirect.net wrote [about Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?]: >speak
From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 04 Apr 1997 13:54:40 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
Reply to:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <yam7033.2009.126475504@clark.net>
On Friday, 04-Apr-97, cmac@txdirect.net wrote [about Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?]:
quoted 4 lines speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who>speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who >thought the chemical brothers were pretty good. ah, wrong!!! i told >then that they are ripoff artist. basically i told them that the >chemsters sucked. same with the prodigy as they mentioned it.
I bet that was loads of fun. -- __ __\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES (aka Rare Guy) / /_\ \ http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html \_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> > , m7= inducing mindwaves.. electronic techno muuusik controlled manually by a p h e x t wi n .. .. . . .
1997-04-04 05:53cmac@txdirect.neta lifeform wrote: > > > speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows
From:
To:
a lifeform
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 03 Apr 1997 22:53:01 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <3344973D.3CEC@txdirect.net>
a lifeform wrote:
quoted 10 lines speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who> > > speaking of the chem bros. today i had to repremand a few fellows who > > thought the chemical brothers were pretty good. ah, wrong!!! i told > > then that they are ripoff artist. basically i told them that the > > chemsters sucked. same with the prodigy as they mentioned it. > > Really. > > So, who did you suggest they listen to? >
The was no point suggesting anything. No hope in that matter. besides, I heard then talk about some christian rock??? Other than that... Has anybody heard Ro70 and System 360. If you havn't... it is pretty good!!! They both are on source records.
1997-04-04 16:36Lazlo Nibble>>> today i had to repremand a few fellows who thought the chemical >>> brothers were pret
From:
Lazlo Nibble
To:
Intelligent Dance Music
Date:
Fri, 4 Apr 1997 09:36:58 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) chem bros movie?!?
permalink · <199704041636.JAA22894@kitsune.swcp.com>
quoted 10 lines today i had to repremand a few fellows who thought the chemical>>> today i had to repremand a few fellows who thought the chemical >>> brothers were pretty good. ah, wrong!!! i told then that they are >>> ripoff artist. basically i told them that the chemsters sucked. same >>> with the prodigy as they mentioned it. >> >> Really. >> >> So, who did you suggest they listen to? > > The was no point suggesting anything. No hope in that matter.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the future of modern music. -- ::: Lazlo (lazlo@swcp.com; http://www.swcp.com/lazlo) ::: Internet Music Wantlists: http://www.swcp.com/lazlo/Wantlists