179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-01-09 16:46Alec McKay Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
├─ 1997-01-09 17:05Zenon M. Feszczak Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
└─ 1997-01-09 19:04i miss the kiss of treachery Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-01-09 16:46Alec McKay+------ Kent Williams wrote: > From idm-owner@hyperreal.com Thu Jan 9 09:56 EST 1997 > Dat
From:
Alec McKay
To:
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 1997 11:46:42 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
permalink · <199701091646.LAA15016@mail1.sas.upenn.edu>
+------ Kent Williams wrote:
quoted 25 lines From idm-owner@hyperreal.com Thu Jan 9 09:56 EST 1997> From idm-owner@hyperreal.com Thu Jan 9 09:56 EST 1997 > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 08:49:30 -0600 (CST) > From: Kent Williams <kent@inav.net> > To: Alec McKay <amckay@sas.upenn.edu> > cc: idm@hyperreal.com > Subject: Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 > In-Reply-To: <199701091427.JAA27969@mail1.sas.upenn.edu> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970109084615.24225A-100000@soli.inav.net> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Sender: idm-owner@hyperreal.com > Precedence: bulk > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Length: 1053 > > On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Alec McKay wrote: > > One of things which make imported compilation so good is the fact that > > these European labels can assemble them without regard to copy write > > problems (record company conflicts) associated with trying to compile a > > similar disc in the USA. > > > I suspect this is completely innaccurate. Perhaps Euro record companies > are easier to work with vis a vis licensing; perhaps there are some > technicalities to the copyright laws in Europe that make it easier, but > the same process applies: You have to obtain license to redistribute > each track from the owner of the track.
* --------------------------------------------------------------------- Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inaccurate. I was talking to a knowledgeable store owner in a Philly IDM store and he said that one of the reasons Euro comps are so good is that, for some reason, labels in Europe are far more likely to allow artists from different labels to appear on an independent comp. USA record companies are much more aggressive in terms of controlling marketing and not having discs which would make inroads into their sales. After all if these Euro compilations are so good, and I think that most people agree that they are, then why are they not marketed in the USA? I like Simon & Garfunkel, the Eagles and James Taylor (yes, I am probably a lot older than you!). If you look at the domestic "greatest hits" compilations of these artists, they absolutely stink in comparison with their Euro counterparts. If USA Warner Brothers allowed the Euro compilation of James Taylor to be freely available here in the USA without penalty, how many people, given the choice, would buy the domestic version? Wire magazine often packages interesting compilations with some monthly issues. They are not available over here because of copy write (ie: US record label's marketing strategy). The only way to get them is to directly subscribe to the magazine. I wonder whether FAX would allow an ambient artist from the Virgin label to appear on one of their CDS? But this is precisely what happens with these Euro comps. Just an inaccurate opinion, but not a totally inaccurate opinion. :-> Alec McKay
1997-01-09 17:05Zenon M. Feszczak> >Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inaccurate. I was talking >to a knowledgea
From:
Zenon M. Feszczak
To:
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:05:22 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
permalink · <v03010d16aefad548b61d@[128.91.202.109]>
quoted 11 lines Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inaccurate. I was talking> >Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inaccurate. I was talking >to a knowledgeable store owner in a Philly IDM store and he said that one >of the reasons Euro comps are so good is that, for some reason, labels in >Europe are far more likely to allow artists from different labels to >appear on an independent comp. USA record companies are much more >aggressive in terms of controlling marketing and not having discs which >would make inroads into their sales. After all if these Euro compilations >are so good, and I think that most people agree that they are, then why are >they not marketed in the USA? >
Another possible reason: There may still be simply more demand for this music in UK/Euro than in the States. In the U.S., this music remains mainly an underground phenom. 3
1997-01-09 19:04i miss the kiss of treacheryOn Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Alec McKay wrote: > Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inacc
From:
i miss the kiss of treachery
To:
Identifiably Demonic Music
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:04:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) SUBREVIEW: Dream Injection 2 (fwd)
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95L.970109140215.22776F-100000@unixs2.cis.pitt.edu>
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Alec McKay wrote:
quoted 2 lines Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inaccurate. I was talking> Well it might be inaccurate, but not totally inaccurate. I was talking > to a knowledgeable store owner in a Philly IDM store and he said that one
please say it was brandon at digital underground. the other guy's an utter, arrogant idiot. e========e========e========e========e========e========e========e / euroboy, tenderspot of the daphne, life'sedge, moebius, ick... / mjsst87+@pitt.edu OR euroboy@mail.prolog.net X \ let me hear you/make decisions/without your television/let me \ hear you speaking/just for me e========e========e========e========e========e========e========e