179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-12-10 04:14Paul Rafanello (idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
├─ 1996-12-10 05:19Julius anthony Martinez Re: (idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
└─ 1996-12-10 06:46Robert Feugate Re: (idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-12-10 04:14Paul RafanelloTim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?" Nope. I've yet to be disappointed wi
From:
Paul Rafanello
To:
Date:
Mon, 09 Dec 1996 23:14:52 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
permalink · <2.2.32.19961210041452.006b251c@host.warwick.net>
Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?" Nope. I've yet to be disappointed with anything on the label yet. I just picked up the new 12" TLS vs Being, and it's better than I expected. "Thurxton Races" is the best track. We have both Blue CD's, Conemelt, TLS, David Being, David Harrow (Technova), the great Emissions comps and more. The Fresh Emissions 2CD comp is easily surpasses Threads, It's All Becoming Clear, Blech, and other compilations. How many Rephlex releases have you listened to all the way through in one listening? Paul Rafanello intone@warwick.net
1996-12-10 05:19Julius anthony MartinezOn Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Paul Rafanello wrote: > Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed u
From:
Julius anthony Martinez
To:
Paul Rafanello
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
Reply to:
(idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95.961209211219.8024A-100000@mail.sdsu.edu>
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Paul Rafanello wrote:
quoted 5 lines Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?"> Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?" > > Nope. I've yet to be disappointed with anything on the label yet. I > just picked up the new 12" TLS vs Being, and it's better than I expected. > "Thurxton Races" is the best track.
Geez. Where can I get this? I've been trying through my local source but no luck. Any mailorder places in the US have this? I've been very interested in hearing this. The Emissions label releases are usually very high quality but I didn't care for the Blue - Tail Feather ep too much. Felt it was below their excellent standard set by the albums.
quoted 2 lines We have both Blue CD's, Conemelt, TLS, David Being, David Harrow> We have both Blue CD's, Conemelt, TLS, David Being, David Harrow > (Technova), the great Emissions comps and more.
How's the second Technova album? Have the first one which is pretty good. PS. I also need Being-Monthly transmission/September 12". Can anyone Help? Will buy or trade for it and pay a decent price. :) Thanks.
1996-12-10 06:46Robert Feugate>Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?" > > Nope. I've yet to be disappoint
From:
Robert Feugate
To:
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:46:34 -1000
Subject:
Re: (idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
Reply to:
(idm) Has the Emissions label failed us yet?
permalink · <v03007801aed297a582cd@[199.222.42.139]>
quoted 6 lines Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?">Tim Zeigler: "Has the Emissions label failed us yet?" > > Nope. I've yet to be disappointed with anything on the label yet. I >just picked up the new 12" TLS vs Being, and it's better than I expected. >"Thurxton Races" is the best track. >
Can't really agree with you on this one. TLS vs. being sound more being than TLS and then it didn't really sound like the being I'm used to hearing. sounded more chunky than smooth... However I have to say yes! to emissions not failing us. hopefully the label will survive longer than Sabrettes or Sabres of Paradise and continue to put out more weirdness we all can enjoy. robert feugate rfeugate@hawaii.edu / grizzla@lava.net