179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Carl Craig is not lame

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-11-21 16:43Aran Parillo (idm) Carl Craig is not lame
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-11-21 16:43Aran Parillo>[...]Carl Craig is filed under lame and undesirable. Wow. You must NOT be including his 6
From:
Aran Parillo
To:
Date:
Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:43:30 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
(idm) Carl Craig is not lame
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95.961121113901.4594B-100000@columbus.hnt.com>
quoted 1 line [...]Carl Craig is filed under lame and undesirable.>[...]Carl Craig is filed under lame and undesirable.
Wow. You must NOT be including his 69 alias in your judgement (or whatever you call that aforementioned unpretty 'loaded' statement. Certainly his recent output has not been 1/2 as inventive as the 'old shit', that much I will agree upon. But caramba, those 69 recs kikarse. Teep .... . . . . . . . . . . . . .... Aran M. Parillo -> aran@hnt.com <- Deck Hand Et Al Harrison & Troxell