IDM Mailing Archive

1996-10-02 03:40JamesFrom NME: --- KUSHTI Lifers (Octopus) Disappointing follow-up to Kushti's excellent Plaid-

From:: James <JSEO@us.oracle.com>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: 01 Oct 96 20:40:13 -0700
Subject:: (idm) Kushti not Plaid?

From NME: --- KUSHTI Lifers (Octopus) Disappointing follow-up to Kushti's excellent Plaid-backed debut 'Freestyle'. Despite cinematic ambitions, 'Lifers' is far too laid-back to raise an eyelid, let alone an eyebrow. --- Does this mean that "Lifers" is NOT 'Plaid-backed'? I was really looking forward to it, but if Plaid didn't work on it... Thanks, On now: Cup of Tea comp. James Jung-Hoon Seo // Oracle New Media (415) 506-3829 // jseo@us.oracle.com My whole thing is to take completely retarded songs and turn them into something of my own. What can I bring to a song that's already been done well? // Mark Kozelek

1996-10-02 11:36Graham SimsIn article: <199610021010.DAA27819@taz.hyperreal.com> owner-idm@hyperreal.com writes: > Fr

From:: Graham Sims <gsims@c-zone.demon.co.uk>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 12:36:36 +0100
Subject:: (idm) Kushti not Plaid?

In article: <199610021010.DAA27819@taz.hyperreal.com> owner-idm@hyperreal.com writes:

quoted 6 lines From: "James" <JSEO@us.oracle.com>

> From: "James" <JSEO@us.oracle.com> > Date: 01 Oct 96 20:40:13 -0700 > Subject: (idm) Kushti not Plaid? > > > >From NME:

quoted 4 lines - ---

> > - --- > > Does this mean that "Lifers" is NOT 'Plaid-backed'? I was really

looking

quoted 7 lines forward to it, but if Plaid didn't work on it...

> forward to it, but if Plaid didn't work on it... > > Thanks, > > On now: Cup of Tea comp. > >

It is Plaid as far as I know, wot do nme know anyway. Cheers, Graham. -- -------------------------------------------------------------- email gsims@c-zone.demon.co.uk : Connective Zone : Invisibles -------------------------------------------------------------- WWW: http://www.c-zone.demon.co.uk

1996-10-04 09:11g3On Wed, 02 Oct 1996 12:36:36 +0100, you wrote: >> Does this mean that "Lifers" is NOT 'Pla

From:: g3 <g3@bleep.org>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: Fri, 04 Oct 1996 09:11:58 GMT
Subject:: Re: (idm) Kushti not Plaid?
Reply to:: (idm) Kushti not Plaid?

On Wed, 02 Oct 1996 12:36:36 +0100, you wrote:

quoted 5 lines Does this mean that "Lifers" is NOT 'Plaid-backed'? I was really

>> Does this mean that "Lifers" is NOT 'Plaid-backed'? I was really >looking >> forward to it, but if Plaid didn't work on it... >> >It is Plaid as far as I know, wot do nme know anyway.

I think it was Ed (only) having a dabble. g.