179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Beaumont Hannant 12"

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
1996-01-11 05:23David Mackay Ross (idm) Beaumont Hannant 12"
└─ 1996-01-12 21:25cameron Re: (idm) Beaumont Hannant 12"
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-01-11 05:23David Mackay RossI got a copy of Beaumont Hannant's limited edition one-sided 12" that came out in October
From:
David Mackay Ross
To:
Date:
Wed, 10 Jan 1996 23:23:04 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
(idm) Beaumont Hannant 12"
permalink · <199601110523.XAA14833@electra.cc.umanitoba.ca>
I got a copy of Beaumont Hannant's limited edition one-sided 12" that came out in October 95 (?). The pressing was horrible and I (unfortunately) had to return it. One channal was only about 20% of the volume of the right channel. Even after adjusting the balance and increasing the volume the quality was still poor. I don't recall any discussion of this in the fall. Did anyone have the same problem? Dave
1996-01-12 21:25cameroncan you be more specific as to which 12" it was? _________________________________________
From:
cameron
To:
David Mackay Ross
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 1996 13:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Beaumont Hannant 12"
Reply to:
(idm) Beaumont Hannant 12"
permalink · <Pine.LNX.3.91.960112132452.19865A-100000@beast.fishtank.com>
can you be more specific as to which 12" it was? ______________________________________________________________________________ Cameron Bowden cameron@fishtank.com Blacksmith on the anvil in your ear... Electronica for the jaded and discerning boingboomtchackboingboomtchackboingboomtchackboingboomtchackboingboomtchack ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On Wed, 10 Jan 1996, David Mackay Ross wrote:
quoted 12 lines I got a copy of Beaumont Hannant's limited edition one-sided 12" that came out> I got a copy of Beaumont Hannant's limited edition one-sided 12" that came out > in October 95 (?). The pressing was horrible and I (unfortunately) had to > return it. One channal was only about 20% of the volume of the right channel. > Even after adjusting the balance and increasing the volume the quality was > still poor. > > I don't recall any discussion of this in the fall. Did anyone have the same > problem? > > Dave > >