| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1995-01-0110:18 | <XdadaX@aol.com> | Re: Orbital Snivilisation >Since hearing _Snivilisation_, I've gone back and listened to all >previous… |
| 2000-05-0204:24 | Steve Oliver <stevie@ignition.org.uk> | Re: [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation Since there already seems to be a couple of bucks in the… |
| 2000-05-0101:41 | shep. <shephrdNOSPAM@earthlink.net> | [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation I was listening to In Sides today for the first time in… |
| 2000-05-0115:58 | <Evan@mmlive.com> | RE: [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation Snivilisation never did excite me too much (but it is a relatively… |
| 2000-05-0102:38 | Visions Of Bubba <sbabakha@videon.wave.ca> | Re: [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation
i would say that snivilisation does not have the consistency that in… |
| 2000-05-0117:46 | Johan Kotlinski <spleen@darkface.pp.se> | Re: [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation At 18:41 2000-04-30 -0700, you wrote:
>I was listening… |
| 1996-04-1922:15 | David Mackay Ross <umross10@cc.umanitoba.ca> | (idm) Orbital 2 vs. Snivilisation I've always found it interesting that many people slag off Sniv… |
| 1996-04-2002:00 | Julius anthony Martinez <martinez@mail.sdsu.edu> | Re: (idm) Orbital 2 vs. Snivilisation
On Fri, 19 Apr 1996, David Mackay Ross wrote:
> Those who enjoyed… |
| 2000-05-0113:32 | Irene McC <substar@iafrica.com> | Re: [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation On 30 Apr 00, shep. wrote re [idm] Orbital: Snivilisation:
> I was… |
| 1996-04-2015:18 | dan brown <snowman@orie.cornell.edu> | Re: (idm) Orbital 2 vs. Snivilisation I've always found it interesting that many people slag off Sniv… |