| 1997-05-0801:34 | john/bergmayer <yesno@primenet.com> | Re: Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix)
and what of uk copyright laws? what's fair use there?
|
| 1997-05-0801:33 | john/bergmayer <yesno@primenet.com> | RE: Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix)
how could a tax on recording devices possibly pay artists? would the… |
| 1997-05-0716:38 | Adam J Weitzman <weitzman@individual.com> | Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix) And the great "copyright debate" circle comes 'round again. I put my… |
| 1997-05-0714:37 | The Rare Guy <buh@clark.net> | RE: Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix)
[note: this msg is not to Chris Fahey just because i'm… |
| 1997-05-0716:55 | g. <greg@warp-net.com> | Re: Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix) On Wed, 07 May 1997 12:38:10 -0400, you wrote:
>And… |
| 1997-05-0717:02 | Chris Fahey <chris@wanderlust.com> | RE: Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix) I agree with your interpretation of the "no longer a consumer" excuse… |
| 1997-05-0718:01 | Adam J Weitzman <weitzman@individual.com> | Re: Copyright infringement (was Re: (idm) radio mix) g. wrote:
> erm, what about mechanical publishing royalties? who pays those. so… |