| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1997-12-2902:05 | Oeivind Idsoe <terje.idsoe@online.no> | Re: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. Oeivind Idsoe wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm following you here… |
| 2002-02-1617:11 | tom <tomagotchi@lineone.net> | [idm] the wire / microhouse etc.. someone mentioned a genuinely informative and interesting article in the
wire about… |
| 1997-12-3101:38 | Steve /k/./F/ <kung.funk@virgin.net> | Re: Subject: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. [sm] wrote:
> >"Loveless" is better than anything ever called IDM or techno… |
| 1997-12-2823:56 | \[sm\] <sm.mfr@virgin.net> | Subject: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. >I whole-heartedly agree. Any kind of ignoration (is that a word… |
| 1997-12-2902:33 | Brian & Sharon Beuchaw <beuchaw@enteract.com> | Re: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. First, Peter Hollo asks:
> OK, just out of interest, how long has… |
| 2002-02-1714:45 | Colin Buttimer <c.buttimer@mdx.ac.uk> | Re: [idm] the wire / microhouse etc.. Err Tom - the article you refer to was very fine and the… |
| 1997-12-2803:06 | Steve /k/./F/ <kung.funk@virgin.net> | Re: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. > > I whole-heartedly agree. Any kind of ignoration (is that a word… |
| 1997-12-2803:23 | Arthur B. Purvis <abpurvis@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> | Re: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. > > I had little use for free jazz, but I knew there had… |
| 1997-12-3100:32 | Mark Kolmar <mkolmar@xnet.com> | RE: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. Just wanted to throw in a (slightly self-promotional) $0.02, re… |
| 1997-12-2816:42 | Ashok Divakaran <adivakaran@worldbank.org> | RE: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. > I'll say this: all your arguments are good, and they all… |
| 1997-12-2800:17 | Arthur B. Purvis <abpurvis@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> | (idm) The Wire etc. etc. > I have to 'defend' The Wire, as I think it's one… |
| 1997-12-2901:29 | Oeivind Idsoe <terje.idsoe@online.no> | Re: (idm) The Wire etc. etc. Arthur B. Purvis wrote:
> I have had this argument enough times to… |