| 1999-02-1000:01 | <DzrtMusic@aol.com> | Re: (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! I need to go down to the local Circle K and chug… |
| 1999-02-1022:26 | zimbo <tofu@uci.edu> | Re: (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers!
> damn, you got me. i was trying to make a joke, and… |
| 1999-02-1102:05 | Rjyan C Kidwell <cardhore@juno.com> | (idm) Re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! >> damn, you got me. i was trying to make a joke, and… |
| 1999-02-1101:06 | martin burbridge <mbridge@imagicians.com> | RE: (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! > damn, you got me. i was trying to make a joke, and… |
| 1999-02-0923:09 | Matthew Korfhage <mkorfha@linfield.edu> | Re: (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers!
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Rjyan C Kidwell wrote:
> hey. i said… |
| 1999-02-1022:00 | Rjyan C Kidwell <cardhore@juno.com> | Re: (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! >Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 16:31:54 -0800 (PST)
>From: mike… |
| 1999-02-1102:14 | Rjyan C Kidwell <cardhore@juno.com> | (idm) Re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! >> damn, you got me. i was trying to make a joke, and… |
| 1999-02-0922:34 | Rjyan C Kidwell <cardhore@juno.com> | (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! >Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 19:54:29 EST
>From: DzrtMusic@aol… |
| 1999-02-1000:31 | <mike@hyperreal.org> | Re: (idm) re: classical is not for stodgy old wankers! > >> idm will not be the "new classical." it shall be the new… |