| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1999-02-1700:54 | Jon <jon@jonx.clara.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format > > i am not versed in the science of sound, but can
> > humans… |
| 1999-02-1920:32 | Scott Jackson <sjackson@megsinet.net> | Re: (idm) re: 24bit 96kHz format >Okay, this isn't exactly right... Any waveform that looks like
>/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ is… |
| 1999-02-1604:47 | Aaron S Michelson <asm2+@andrew.cmu.edu> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format Excerpts from mail: 15-Feb-99 Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format by… |
| 1999-02-1523:59 | Stuart McDonald <satori@sans.vuw.ac.nz> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Marc 3 Poirier wrote:
> 44.1 kHz… |
| 1999-02-2102:10 | Neb Eliven <neb-eliven@home.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format > As long as we're on the subject of
> the finer points… |
| 1999-02-1715:25 | public anemone <chrism@absolutepitch.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format Che wrote:
> >i am not versed in the science of sound, but… |
| 1999-02-1907:29 | Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format > On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, public anemone wrote:
> > below the actual tone… |
| 1999-02-1517:13 | Aaron S Michelson <asm2+@andrew.cmu.edu> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format Excerpts from mail: 15-Feb-99 (idm) 24bit 96kHz format by SWEET… |
| 1999-02-1907:43 | szalemandre <octorock@doubtful.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Andrew Hime wrote:
> > A decent and easy… |
| 1999-02-1901:35 | Mark Kolmar <mkolmar@xnet.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, public anemone wrote:
> below the actual tone… |
| 1999-02-1620:37 | Marc 3 Poirier <mpoirier@virtu.sar.usf.edu> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format > I can't believe how spoiled people are by CD Audio that… |
| 1999-02-1716:46 | william ratke <adroxy@telusplanet.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format
>
>me too...but neither you nor i can actually hear them...what… |
| 1999-02-1523:52 | Marc 3 Poirier <mpoirier@virtu.sar.usf.edu> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format > About the only practical application of this audio technology is in the… |
| 1999-02-1715:53 | martin wood <martin.wood@advent-comm.co.uk> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format
william ratke wrote:
> >
> >me too...but neither you nor i can actually… |
| 1999-02-1623:13 | ChairCrusher <kent@avalon.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Marc 3 Poirier wrote:
> > I can't… |
| 1999-02-1901:26 | Mark Kolmar <mkolmar@xnet.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, ChairCrusher wrote:
> I'd like to see… |
| 1999-02-1516:26 | cl <clietz@enteract.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format Marc 3 Poirier wrote:
>
> > About the only practical application of this audio… |
| 1999-02-1715:16 | public anemone <chrism@absolutepitch.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format Marc 3 Poirier wrote:
> I like all of the music that I… |
| 1999-02-1920:32 | Scott Jackson <sjackson@megsinet.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format >Excerpts from mail: 15-Feb-99 Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format by… |
| 1999-02-1610:30 | Peter Shultz <pashultz@Princeton.EDU> | (idm) re: 24bit 96kHz format >Aw jeez, this is totally bogus. 16-bit 44.1 kHz is… |
| 1999-02-1915:27 | ChairCrusher <kent@avalon.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Mark Kolmar wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb… |
| 1999-02-1606:11 | Marc 3 Poirier <mpoirier@virtu.sar.usf.edu> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format At 10:26 AM 2/15/99 -0600, cl wrote:
>Marc 3… |
| 1999-02-1616:07 | ChairCrusher <kent@avalon.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format I can't believe how spoiled people are by CD Audio that… |
| 1999-02-1615:03 | public anemone <chrism@absolutepitch.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format As for IDM? 16bit/44.1kHz is fine.
>
> Aw jeez, this is… |
| 1999-02-1921:42 | Mark Kolmar <mkolmar@xnet.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, ChairCrusher wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 1999… |
| 1999-02-1707:26 | ChairCrusher <kent@avalon.net> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Che wrote:
> At 12:13 PM 2… |
| 1999-02-1701:28 | Che <zeus8@synthcom.com> | Re: (idm) 24bit 96kHz format At 12:13 PM 2/15/99 -0500, Aaron S Michelson wrote… |