| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-02-2318:46 | Ernesto Ikerd <IkerdEA@lmtas.lmco.com> | (idm) question: raves & age Did raves get lamer, or did I get older?
26 year-old… |
| 2000-02-2319:40 | <Magicnerd8@aol.com> | Re: (idm) question: raves & age When even dance-floor techheads in SoCal are not associating themselves with… |
| 2000-02-2408:04 | Irene McC <substar@iafrica.com> | Re: (idm) question: raves & age On 23 Feb 00, MikeD wrote re Re: (idm) question: raves & age… |
| 2000-02-2318:55 | Andrew Duke <cognition@ns.sympatico.ca> | Re: (idm) question: raves & age both
30 year-old andrew
Ernesto Ikerd wrote:
> Did raves get lamer… |
| 2000-02-2514:17 | Kelley Hackett <khackett@aba.iupui.edu> | RE: (idm) question: raves & age Both!
-----Original Message-----
From: Ernesto Ikerd [mailto:IkerdEA@lmtas.lmco.com]
Sent… |
| 2000-02-2408:49 | Ghetto TR-707 <ghetto_tr707@hotmail.com> | Re: (idm) question: raves & age
>imo they are becoming much more commercialised, throwing the
>original 'keep it… |
| 2000-02-2319:35 | MikeD <mikeyd@pubnix.org> | Re: (idm) question: raves & age i agree with andrew. both.
but there are still some innovative promoters… |
| 2000-02-2319:43 | Kent williams <kent@avalon.net> | Re: (idm) question: raves & age > Ernesto Ikerd wrote:
>
> > Did raves get lamer, or did I get older… |