| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1998-01-2223:16 | chris r graves <grav@juno.com> | (idm) bad urmur > WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE _URMUR_ EPS ?
why, they are a departure… |
| 1998-01-2820:10 | GamePrg. <buh@clark.net> | Re: (idm) bad urmur On Thursday, 22-Jan-98, chris r graves wrote [about (idm) bad… |
| 1998-01-2912:39 | GamePrg. <buh@clark.net> | Re: (idm) bad urmur On Thursday, 29-Jan-98, Edward Pond wrote [about Re: (idm) bad… |
| 1998-01-3001:48 | GamePrg. <buh@clark.net> | Re: (idm) mike slags dmx, etc. (was: bad urmur) On Friday, 30-Jan-98, mult-- erantmundas.gaptena wrote [about Re: (idm… |
| 1998-01-2912:48 | siliconvortex <artist@sub-con-geo.demon.co.uk> | Re: (idm) bad urmur >Recently a friend of mine sent a demo to Mike P. and… |
| 1998-01-2902:31 | chip <alucas@telerama.com> | Re: (idm) bad urmur On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, GamePrg. wrote:
> actually they are quite crappish… |
| 1998-01-2916:03 | Edward Pond <EdPond@compuserve.com> | Re: (idm) bad urmur I'd like to add my thoughts to this debate, since it… |
| 1998-01-2823:07 | GamePrg. <buh@clark.net> | Re: (idm) bad urmur On Thursday, 29-Jan-98, chip wrote [about Re: (idm) bad urmur… |
| 1998-01-3000:33 | lwtcdi <graham@lwtcdi.prestel.co.uk> | Re: (idm) bad urmur I agree that Urmur Bile is crappy and totally unfocussed. As I… |