179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Al Ritchie
To:
Date:
Fri, 22 Jul 1994 08:28:18 CDT
Subject:
Re: eno on ambient
Msg-Id:
<MAILQUEUE-101.940722082818.256@vilas.uwex.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9407.gz
Jon Kale <spbcajk@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
quoted 5 lines If I remember correctly, the genesis for the form was Eno, at home,>If I remember correctly, the genesis for the form was Eno, at home, >listening to the way his fridge, the vacuum cleaner in the next >room, the traffic and people in the street and so on all merged into >a whole; this whole was simultaneously engaging if listened to and >ignorable if desired.
quoted 1 line Sorry if this all comes across as a load of pretentious bollocks :)>Sorry if this all comes across as a load of pretentious bollocks :)
I'm no Eno expert, but I believe this is a precise definition of his original concept of "ambient." The way that techno fans/artists use the word is really in a different sense than that in which Eno used it. Thus, Eno's comment about "what they're calling ambient now." It's similar to the term "industrial." What most people now call industrial is radically different from the music it first described. Language changes, but that doesn't necessarily mean the current use of those terms is any less legitimate than the original uses. Wait...am I babbling? Al.