179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Jon Drukman
Date:
Thu, 24 Feb 94 14:00:17 PST
Subject:
Re: future sound of london
Mbox:
idm.9402.gz
Dave Walker:
quoted 4 lines To be quite blunt about it, I haven't felt compelled to listen to>To be quite blunt about it, I haven't felt compelled to listen to >"ephidrena" enough to gain anything near that level of familiarity with >it. No more than I get the urge to look at the white textured walls in my >apartment for hours trying to find the smooth bits, if you get my analogy...
sorry, i think the analogy is more like "i took one look at this painting but it was just a complete mass of unintelligible swirls and colors." you're looking at something like an impressionist painting and only seeing the little dots, not the picture underneath.
quoted 7 lines perhaps FSOL is just>> perhaps FSOL is just >> too... well... *futuristic* for the people on this list (i'm not >> singling you out dave) who claim that they want to hear the future of >> music but in actuality prefer a thumpin' 909, some gratuitous weird >> noises, and a few simple synth lines around it. > >Forgive my bluntness once again, but that's a truckload of buffalo ordure.
well, i've already got a few letters in private from people who agree with me on that point, so you'll forgive me if i continue to believe it.
quoted 3 lines I don't have a really clear picture of what the future of music will be,>I don't have a really clear picture of what the future of music will be, >and despite protestations to the contrary I'm not particularly convinced >that most musicians and IDM-readers really know either.
i didn't mean to say that "in the future, all music will sound like FSOL" - just that they are doing stuff that is too complicated for some people to grok in the present day and perhaps in the future it will all seem simpler.
quoted 4 lines So true. But it _works_. For all it's "simplicity" and adherence to>So true. But it _works_. For all it's "simplicity" and adherence to >"standard" techno structure, it achieves more for me than the majority >of the "listen to the wonderful noises, and pass the bong while you're >at it" stuff on AA.
for you, yes. but i get the sense from you (and others) who are perplexed by AA that an album full of PNG-style music would be quite welcome. FSOL themselves realize that that would probably get good reviews and sell quite well but they prefer to forge ahead. and i applaud them for it.
quoted 7 lines Perhaps it's a matter of history and perspective -- I'm approaching>Perhaps it's a matter of history and perspective -- I'm approaching >this from more of a "Detroit" direction. To me, what Jeff Mills >accomplishes on "Atlantis" is far more impressive than what Dougans & >Cockbain do on "Ephidrena" -- working almost entirely with >synthesized/tweaked sounds (produced on bog-standard synths and a >phalanx of distortion boxes) he creates a *coherent* sonic landscape >that never sounds forced or gimmicky.
personally, i don't think AA is forced or gimmicky either - it all flows in a *natural* manner. there's a sound on "swab" towards the end - a sort of downward sweeping dark synth that appears and fits in perfectly with the beat. it continues through the break and "mountain goat" takes off around it - but the sound is still repeating at the same interval! and it fits perfectly in both tracks. touches like that are why I claim that AA is inspired art and not a bunch of thrown together noodling. listening to "accelerator" right now and totally grooving... Jon Drukman jdrukman%dlsun87@oracle.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.