Fuckin A, anyone who argues that Twin is not the godfather of IDM is a fucking fool.
kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com> wrote:[the first sentence continues after "aphex twin", though.]
eric
the point was that you're trying to debase listmembers opinions
with something you obviously have no knowledge of
while noone said "aphex twin roolz", he did kinda start the movement
(although you might not be aware of that)
["aphex twin roolz" isn't a comment on all the great genres that
IDM is responsible for. whatever those are.]
it sounds like you don't like idm at all
perhaps you could find another list
from which you could vocally defecate upon
as you've already taken the i out of this IDM list
btw
i think sparking a bedroom producer craze would be friggin awesome
we need more independent music makers
On 9/26/05, Eric wrote:
quoted 53 lines kenny ***** wrote:
>
> kenny ***** wrote:
> > people have conversations that are more than a series of question asking
> > the discussion was about genres, perhaps you've been following the wrong
> > thread?
>
> nope. "aphex twin roolz" isn't a comment on all the great genres that
> IDM is responsible for. whatever those are.
>
> > here's the link to the IDM page
> > http://music.hyperreal.org/lists/idm/
> > you might want to read the first sentence
>
> the first sentence continues after "aphex twin", though.
>
> > i've been around since rdj only had tiny vinyl releases,
> > trying to get my buddies to get em at the uk record stores (they were
> > very hard to get, even back then)
> > i certainly remember when the IDM term first started circulating in the
> rags
> > and i still maintain that the term idm is a poor description of the
> > music he pioneered
> >
> > but that was the point of the conversation and how the conversation
> began
>
> only if you think genres related to idm means genres related to aphex
> twin. it's a stupid thread anyway, especially when people mention grime
> in this context.
>
>
> >
> > you haven't insulted me, you just appear confused
> > maybe you should take your own advice?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/26/05, *Eric* < eric@synthesizer.org >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > the point was to actually have conversation on the list
> > > not an excuse to be a twat
> >
> > you must mean your "i wonder..." question. it's the only conversational
> > part of your post because the bit before that is completely
> > unrelated to
> > it. i responded to both.
> >
> > if you don't think that sparking a retro bedroom producer craze is a
> > valid reaction to the analords then say so rather than being insulting.
> >
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com