on 7/1/02 2:34 am, c. reider at vuzh@peakpeak.com wrote:
quoted 16 lines on 1/6/02 7:23 PM, lee at leeg@soundtree.fsnet.co.uk wrote:> on 1/6/02 7:23 PM, lee at leeg@soundtree.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
>
>> Autechre should be working within the film industry as sound designers...
>> after all that's their fundamental style nowdays isn't it?
>>
>> L.
>
> disagreed again.
>
> their work on 'Confield' interested me structurally more than timbrally.
>
> c.
>
> . .. . .
>
>
I like to keep an open mind...
People make films for sound as do artists.
I do not for one second think that what Autechre (and others) produce within
the complexity of the Arrangement or Production would be problematic within
film.
Yes I agree with the 'Confield' album being more structural than tumbrel,
why would that affect using their technique within in a film?
I am not saying that it would be wise to use their methods consistently
throughout. If you know how to apply theirs or others with ideas into film
then the results can be very interesting.
L.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org