179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 23:03:35 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Confield
Msg-Id:
<5.1.0.14.2.20011012230017.0263d340@youn0394.email.umn.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<F88DbH8J0sca0ZkfzDs00005602@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0110.gz
At 11:16 PM 10/12/2001 +0000, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines There is the fact that Autechre refered to using generative composition on>There is the fact that Autechre refered to using generative composition on >Confield in interviews. That being said, I feel that Confield is more >creative than Tri-Repeatae.
Right, well, I'm just wondering how a listener would distinguish this. People always slap the "generative" label on Mr. Devine, although it's not. And some people slap the "non-generative" label on things that are. How can you tell the difference? Confield doesn't sound generative to me; just hyperintricate. And, for the record, I've never liked all of Tri Repetae. About half the songs are pretty decent, basically the first 4 songs and Rsdio. Can't say I like Amber all that much, either. But I love Incunabula, and listen to ep7 all the way through, but don't really like lp5? maybe I'm just confused ;D Maybe I should talk about this to mr. piontek ;D derek ------- eggytoast.com ------- fresh like pie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org