I never understood why so much time is wasted on bitching about a name of a
genre of music. Better things.....
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Zombiefly <zombiefly@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 44 lines i always preferred the label "electronica" for the genre. But at the time
> i always preferred the label "electronica" for the genre. But at the time
> IDM came to be because the UK was dancing in fields to 4-4 beat piano
> tracks inter-dispersed with hoover sounds. It was viewed that Autechre etc.
> was more "listening music", therefore more intelligent than the generic
> fodder blasting into the countryside at 6am.... i guess :)
>
> On 23 September 2014 13:32, kawayama <kawayama@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> bit too much nit-picking and defensiveness going on here, i think.
>> "intelligent dance music" is an okay name for a mailing list, but a
>> horrible name for a genre, can we not all agree on that?
>>
>> and Warp only named their compilation "artificial intelligence", as in
>> the scientific concept, they never claimed the music was more intelligent
>> than other music. in fact, Warp called it 'listening music' in the liner
>> notes. it was the creators of this list who named it.
>>
>> k
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> constant shallowness leads to evil.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________
> Sent from my Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48K
> _____________________________________________
> noise I make:
> http://www.soundcloud.com/pushkin
> http://www.last.fm/music/Pushkin
>
> noise I like:
> http://www.last.fm/user/zombiefly
>
> sites I run:
> http://www.ctran.co.uk
> http://o-fu-online.net
> -------------------------------
>
--
22tape/jared dunne
listen <
http://22tape.com>