179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Charles R. Terhune
To:
ralph isis ,
Date:
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:21:36 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] monolake's gravity
Msg-Id:
<B70C8DF0.1D7D%chuck0@cfom-music.com>
In-Reply-To:
<F160mEaJswFCHOzyfyz00002c78@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0104.gz
quoted 1 line ok, not techincally IDM but what's the general consensus on this album?> ok, not techincally IDM but what's the general consensus on this album?
IT KICKS ASSS!!!
quoted 4 lines i've been hesitant on buying this simply because my want list is too big.> i've been hesitant on buying this simply because my want list is too big. > is it just more of the same (in which I'll skip), or do they take it in a > more interesting direction? i enjoyed interstate more as it tended to be > more uptempo than its predecessor.
It's better than interstate, IMO. Much better.
quoted 4 lines also, i was always a huge fan of porter ricks (and thomas koner).. during> also, i was always a huge fan of porter ricks (and thomas koner).. during > their brief span on chain reaction, they were easily my favorite. does > anybody have any recommendations for that brand of sub-aquatic > dub/minimalist techno?
Hmmm. Not exactly. But the new Scorn is like Porter Ricks on PCP!! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org