179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Lee Azzarello
To:
IDM
Date:
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:41:57 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] [LONG] Possible Futures (was Re: [313] digital mixing/trading on napster)
Msg-Id:
<B64C17B5.283C%roswell@alumni.antioch-college.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0011300129500.1422-100000@populo.vip.fi>
Mbox:
idm.0011.gz
on 11/29/00 5:08 PM, Nuutti-Iivari Meriläinen at gordon@populo.vip.fi wrote:
quoted 5 lines Maybe I'm romanticising and waxing a bit poetic here, but that's how I> Maybe I'm romanticising and waxing a bit poetic here, but that's how I > feel about it. I will not directly discard the idea of a better way of > mixing music, but I don't see a directly possible vinyl-free future for us > DJs in the digital world. Can someone else can come up with more possible > scenarios?
Yes you are waxing very poetic but most of it is true. You can't touch a CD while it is playing, flat out, straight up. If you touch a CD while it is playing, it will not work properly and the results will not be musical. You can touch a record while it is playing. It will still work properly, but the playback speed will change. The results are as musical as the track you are playing... So in the end, CD mixing = good for applications where you don't have to touch the disc for a musical effect, i.e. techno, trance, house. Just do a digital beatmatch and go on your merry way. Vinyl = good for applications where you have to touch the disc for a musical effect, i.e. hip-hop, jungle. -l[e^2] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org