179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Stevens
To:
Static ,
Date:
Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:43:01 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] OT - MP3 encoding
Msg-Id:
<10tutsgklhvsvjffrlv7cr2h2o93imffh6@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To:
<002201c0301d$e9ca2da0$eeecbad8@dslnetworks.com>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
Here's a reply to the message "[idm] OT - MP3 encoding" written on Fri, 6 Oct 2000 22:17:39 -0700:
quoted 3 lines An MP3 encoded Mono @ 44khz or Stereo at 22khz?>An MP3 encoded Mono @ 44khz or Stereo at 22khz? >I know the difference between the two as far as fidelity etc. >But from a technical standpoint, which should *sound* better?
Mono @ 44khz. A degradation in sound quality will be a lot more noticeable than a mono recording. Isn't there a track on Autechre's "EP7" that's in mono? I wonder how many people noticed. Probably a lot less than those who'd notice if the recording was in 22khz! -- Mark Stevens http://www.headspin.clara.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org