179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
matt
To:
Greg Malcolm
Cc:
,
Date:
Sat, 27 May 2000 01:07:49 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] Rap in IDM...?
Msg-Id:
<4.3.0.20000527010536.00b537c0@pop.softhome.net>
In-Reply-To:
<20000523134643.20804.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0005.gz
am i the only one that ADORED progression sessions 3 [ltj bukem, conrad, drs] ? some beautiful mixing, in my opinion with some well thought-out lyrics. -matt At 2000/05/23-09:46 AM-[ Tuesday ], Greg Malcolm wrote:
quoted 13 lines i don't know if i agree with everthing the writer says, but i do agree>i don't know if i agree with everthing the writer says, but i do agree >that it's an uncomfortable synthesis at best...years ago before the whole >"intelligent" drum and bass thing creatively dried up, people started to >rap over the stuccatto beats...logical progression II...(i know this >wasn't the first DNB album with a rapped element) with the same results, >although drum and bass lends itself very much more to the talk-over Mcing, >i found myself then as now just listening harder to the music and wishing >the MC wasn't there...in fact i hardly ever listened to CD 2 of the album, >the one with MC conrad... > >just a thought. > >greg
aol/aim:plexitox mailto:mjastrem@softhome.net http://matt.westphila.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org