179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
n:h
To:
jeff shoemaker
Cc:
Paul Levinson ,
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:30:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: (amb) PLAID - to buy or not to buy
Msg-Id:
<Pine.MAC.4.10.9908271528060.12870-100000@tl1.toshoklabs.com>
In-Reply-To:
<199908271924.OAA14506@mw2.texas.net>
Mbox:
idm.9908.gz
I second that. Paul if you liked Not for 3's, and use the word 'delicious' to describe it, then I would say you will really like Restproof. Its one of my faves for 99, and IMHO has a little more depth than NFT's...and I loved the first one... later Nate On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, jeff shoemaker wrote:
quoted 20 lines Re-listening to Plaid's 'Not for Threes', it is such a delicious CD that I> >Re-listening to Plaid's 'Not for Threes', it is such a delicious CD that I > >am once more considering acquiring 'Rest Proof Clockwork'. The last time I > >remember there was a flood of negative opinions on this CD. Please indulge > >me once more with your feelings on this. > > i like it. > > i like 'not for threes' > > i like both. actually, i think i like the new one best. > > ymmv. > > -jeff > > -------------- > 1642 try 621 > -------------- > >