179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 1997 02:11:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Puckered1 vs. MFR?
Msg-Id:
<971006021148_814783001@emout15.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9710.gz
yadda yadda yadda.... are you gonna bark all night long little doggie, or are you gonna bite? you are so full of shit! you set me up by telling me NOT to insure your package! you probably have the damn thing right in front of you while you type this bullshit! I'm not going to hold your hand until the package arrives, so if I have been less than curtain with you, it's because I know I sent your package, and the fact you haven't recieved it is... (ready? read carefully now) NOT MY FAULT! for 3 lowsy SWANS CD's I would subject myself to this shit from you? whatever happen to your post in WHITEZONE-1, where you said that I had people defending me, so I must be telling you the truth, and the package must be lost in the mail!? also, ever think that you just didn't receive it yet? 4th Class Book Rate from Spet. 23rd just might not have gotten to you yet, mr. smart guy. and just for future record, I already sent GIL (gg2g4ink@sprynet.com) package - Book Rate, I'm going to send aran@hyperreal.org tomorrow, JaySense@aol.com tomorrow, and smcgonag@bates.edu tomorrow... rememer... if anyone can say they sent a package out when they really didn't, anyone can say they never received a package when they really did! no matter what anyone tells you, INSURE YOUR OUTGOING PACKAGES or you run the risk of getting slandered by petty minded people! In a message dated 10/6/97 3:29:19 AM, you wrote:
quoted 30 lines puckered1 wrote:>puckered1 wrote: >>I sell stuff... I'm slow at times, I've had a few people unhappy with my >>mailing or product... shit happenes... the postal system happens... the >>domestic release comes out after I sell the import happens... the crushed >>case happens... >>but the quality I received just seemed so BLATANT! > >Hmmm... Having recently done a "trade" with you where in you received the >package from me, but the package to me was "lost in the mail", an >unfortunate situation which you have made no attempt to clear up or >re-compensate even partially, I find it rather hypocritical of you to be >throwing stones at another "internet dealer". I guess it's ok for a >package not to arrive when the sender can come up with a good excuse.... > >Hmmm...wasn't there something about "People in glass houses shouldn't...." > > >>(which I was half compensated for) >Well at least you got something from them. I've yet to get anything out of >my trade from you. Not even an "I'm sorry". hmmph. > >Sorry y'all, just found a tad bit of irony in reading one "bad" (in my >experience at least) trader bad mouthing another trader, especially when >the person being bad mouthed is one who has a history of being super good >to the scene and has promoted IDM with previously good business and >informative reviews. (sorry y'all but me thinks when a company is in the >midst of a 'break up', ordering from them seems a bit foolhardy no matter >what their reputation. Common sense says to wait until Stu gets his new >company up and running before ordering from him again, 'specially if you've >already got one order outstanding....)