179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Greg Earle
To:
Date:
Fri, 23 Jun 1995 12:11:08 -0700
Subject:
Re: Jake's Racket
Msg-Id:
<9506231911.AA18004@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
In-Reply-To:
<9506231809.AA10882@marinara.MIT.EDU>
Mbox:
idm.9506.gz
quoted 7 lines I'm afraid the Mike P/Clear connection has come up short yet again. Without> I'm afraid the Mike P/Clear connection has come up short yet again. Without > going into detail, this 2x12" tries to make good in the wake of the lackluster > Bantha and fails ... bad. I can't quite put my finger on what's going wrong > here, but my instincts tell me that he's changed the way he works. Whereas > before each song seemed to be an explosion of creativity, these tracks all > play out like u-Ziq by numbers. I guess we were REALLY spoiled by <Tango N > Bluff>.
Heh :-) Just in the interest of opposing points of view, I really liked "Bantha Trax" and thought that "Bluff Limbo" sounded like mu-Ziq by numbers ... (or else "Tango++") But thanks for the tip (and to Matt too), if it's at all different like "Bantha Trax" was I'll be looking forward to it :-) onNow: My air conditioner - Greg P.S. I'm waiting for the obligatory Robert Smith/Dave Walker "a-HEM!!" posting in response to Mike B's last one about SF ruling :-) :-) :-)