179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) me! me! me! company

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-05-21 20:41henrik str0mberg (idm) me! me! me! company
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-05-21 20:41henrik str0mbergquoth <rab@hawaii.rr.com>: >anyone know why Me Co stopped adding the tag "one little <some
From:
henrik str0mberg
To:
Date:
Fri, 21 May 1999 22:41:05 +0200
Subject:
(idm) me! me! me! company
permalink · <v03102801b36b71a64fc6@[212.112.4.158]>
quoth <rab@hawaii.rr.com>:
quoted 1 line anyone know why Me Co stopped adding the tag "one little <some phrase>"?>anyone know why Me Co stopped adding the tag "one little <some phrase>"?
that possibly wasn't me company who wrote that, as the record company in question is called "one little indian". i'd say some record company exec put those tags on the covers. and since then one little indian and me company has split rather violently. this non-amicable divorce resulted in the two releases of björk's "debut" having slightly different covers, and the cover of one shamen-release getting withdrawn. the two companies are now on speaking terms again, but this is the reason me company now rables on about "moral rights asserted and reserved blah blah blah" on recent coverdesigns. hs _________________ colour is opinion