179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Subject: Re: (idm) strangelove kubrik

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-03-10 09:18Steve Taylor Subject: Re: (idm) strangelove kubrik
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-10 09:18Steve Taylor> >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 11:08:58 +0100 > >From: nd <abardell@tinet.ch> > >Subject: Re: (i
From:
Steve Taylor
To:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:18:58 -0000
Subject:
Subject: Re: (idm) strangelove kubrik
permalink · <F18761AC70C8D111837800600878CCEB80A996@proxylan2>
quoted 7 lines Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 11:08:58 +0100> >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 11:08:58 +0100 > >From: nd <abardell@tinet.ch> > >Subject: Re: (idm) strangelove kubrik > > > >>umm, if you noticed, the top of the message states i cut'n'pasted, in > true > >>plunderphonic style, from cnn.com. but bonus points to you for knowing
the
quoted 12 lines plural of "synopsis".> >>plural of "synopsis". > > > > > >The plural for synopsis is actually "synopses", as it is a feminine noun > > in > >Latin and in its developments in latin languages. It's like that in > > english too. > > speaking of plurals of feminine nouns, what the hell is the > plural of "clitoris"? i've been wanting to know that for years. > anybody? alex, maybe? is it 'clitorises?' that just sounds > wrong. but 'clitori' sounds just plain silly.
I envy you if you ever have the need to use the plural noun in conversation. Steve