179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) AB5

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-03-05 16:14Simon Walley (idm) AB5
└─ 1999-03-05 19:25Andrew Hime Re: (idm) AB5
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-05 16:14Simon Walley>From: Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net> >Subject: (idm) don't slag AB5 > >Bad example, AB5 i
From:
Simon Walley
To:
Date:
Fri, 05 Mar 1999 08:14:27 PST
Subject:
(idm) AB5
permalink · <19990305161427.27131.qmail@hotmail.com>
quoted 5 lines From: Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net>>From: Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net> >Subject: (idm) don't slag AB5 > >Bad example, AB5 is some of his best work. Rumors are about that it may >end up seeing a release.
Best material? Not at all - the AB5 material is just a precursor to the _RDJ LP_ tracks. As a release its pretty weak, theres one or two nice tracks but theres lots of throw-away toss. It won't get released - Rich doesn't want it to be released - and rightly so. He's done much better tracks. || [CiM] || cim_@hotmail.com || - ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
1999-03-05 19:25Andrew Hime> >From: Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net> > >Subject: (idm) don't slag AB5 > > > >Bad exampl
From:
Andrew Hime
To:
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:25:22 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) AB5
Reply to:
(idm) AB5
permalink · <199903051925.NAA32891@kali.wf.net>
quoted 9 lines From: Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net>> >From: Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net> > >Subject: (idm) don't slag AB5 > > > >Bad example, AB5 is some of his best work. Rumors are about that it may > >end up seeing a release. > > Best material? Not at all - the AB5 material is just a precursor to the > _RDJ LP_ tracks. As a release its pretty weak, theres one or two nice > tracks but theres lots of throw-away toss.
Considering that the AB5 stuff predates by several years, that doesn't really jibe.
quoted 2 lines It won't get released - Rich doesn't want it to be released - and> It won't get released - Rich doesn't want it to be released - and > rightly so. He's done much better tracks.
Yeah, that's why when you subscribe to the Rephlex releases list, it says at the very bottom not to ask when it's coming out, because the guy doesn't know yet.