179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: [IDM] Spoiled Fucking Brats!

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-08-10 13:40Neal Thomas (idm) Re: [IDM] Spoiled Fucking Brats!
└─ 1998-08-10 23:46grey Re: (idm) Re: [IDM] Spoiled Fucking Brats!
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-08-10 13:40Neal ThomasOk, you're just an ignorant fool. I'm glad you enjoyed the Autechre sounds that I didn't,
From:
Neal Thomas
To:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Cc:
'jsgd@computerland.net'
Date:
Mon, 10 Aug 1998 08:40:09 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Re: [IDM] Spoiled Fucking Brats!
permalink · <FC13EF9CBDE1D111942000805F9F1E35D831@metonymy.iisd.ca>
Ok, you're just an ignorant fool. I'm glad you enjoyed the Autechre sounds that I didn't, but have a little respect. So many of the counter arguments in this thread have consisted of erecting straw-man arguments consisting of 'aww poor baby, was it too experimental for you? Why don't you just stay home and listen to the CD?' Right from the start, everyone who said they didn't like it UNDERSTOOD what they were trying to achieve. NONE of us wanted a DAT performance. I just happened to think that they failed to capture my attention in a positive way. It's my opinion, and you're ignorant for telling me to fuck off because of it. Don't treat Autechre like rock stars, okay? Blindly idolizing every single scratch and thump that comes out of their instruments, and putting down anyone who disagrees is just bad form. This is a forum for debate about the music not a pissing match to see who loves them more. Neal.
1998-08-10 23:46greyWith this, I'd like to apologize for my response. In retrospect, being critical of _the fa
From:
grey
To:
Neal Thomas
Cc:
'idm@hyperreal.org' , 'jsgd@computerland.net'
Date:
Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: [IDM] Spoiled Fucking Brats!
Reply to:
(idm) Re: [IDM] Spoiled Fucking Brats!
permalink · <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808101640370.15702-100000@astelia.nervosa.sf.ca.us>
With this, I'd like to apologize for my response. In retrospect, being critical of _the fact_ that someone likes/dislikes something gets everyone - as we should ALL well know on this list by now - nowhere. A better way to approach it would have been to temper my surprise, and the (in my eyes) apparent sillyness of the reasons for dislike, with a good measure of curiosity and open-mindedness. So, for that, I apologize to all. <a href = "default/cantweallgetalong>Sarry.</a> </endwastebandwidth> On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Neal Thomas wrote:
quoted 27 lines Ok, you're just an ignorant fool. I'm glad you enjoyed the> > Ok, you're just an ignorant fool. I'm glad you enjoyed the > Autechre sounds that I didn't, but have a little respect. > > So many of the counter arguments in this thread have consisted > of erecting straw-man arguments consisting of 'aww poor baby, was it too > experimental for you? Why don't you just stay home and listen to the > CD?' > > Right from the start, everyone who said they didn't like it > UNDERSTOOD what they were trying to achieve. NONE of us wanted a DAT > performance. I just happened to think that they failed to capture my > attention in a positive way. It's my opinion, and you're ignorant for > telling me to fuck off because of it. > > Don't treat Autechre like rock stars, okay? Blindly idolizing > every single scratch and thump that comes out of their instruments, and > putting down anyone who disagrees is just bad form. This is a forum for > debate about the music not a pissing match to see who loves them more. > > Neal. > > > > > >
-- greyrose@nervosa.sf.ca.us http://www.extortion.com "Millions of human hands at work, billions of minds...a vast network, screaming with life: an organism. A natural organism." - Max Cohen, in the motion picture pi