179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

(idm) Re: idm V1 #1400

3 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-12-28 00:39Arthur B. Purvis (idm) Re: idm V1 #1400
1997-12-28 00:55Arthur B. Purvis (idm) Re: idm V1 #1400
1997-12-28 02:03(idm) Re: idm V1 #1400
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-12-28 00:39Arthur B. Purvis>>> Besides, someone from Princeton talking about pretentiousness? It is= >>> to laugh. >>
From:
Arthur B. Purvis
To:
Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 1997 19:39:38 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #1400
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95.971227192546.25736C-100000@sunlab3.princeton.edu>
quoted 4 lines Besides, someone from Princeton talking about pretentiousness? It is=>>> Besides, someone from Princeton talking about pretentiousness? It is= >>> to laugh. >> >> Umm, fuck you, asshole.
quoted 1 line Hahahaha ... hook, line and sinker.>Hahahaha ... hook, line and sinker.
Yeah, I really fell for that one. You're an asshole making baseless assumptions and I called you on it. Hook, line, and fucking sinker. I'm obviously a snobby, pretentious, rich kid who thinks he's better than everyone else because I attend a certain university. Thanks for letting me know; I'll go see my $200 an hour therapist now and we'll talk about my childhood issues of abandonment. Oh yeah: Your arguments on "young" people are fucking ridiculous. Sure, it's all "new" to me because I'm ca. 20 years old. The only reason techno sounds "new" to you is because you haven't heard it before. Personally, I've heard enough techno along the lines of "Freek Funk" to make me want to puke multicolored streams of violet - same with you and rock and roll. The difference is that I don't automatically think Freek Funk is shit before I actually _listen_ to it - which is what you're doing, and it's just making your argument totally baseless and taking your ignorance of music made without a drum machine to monumental heights. Oh: Fuck you, shithead. You're obviously a shithead, because you listen to Luke Slater. (for the clueless - that was sarcastic irony) --- the humble abbott arthur purvis set his hand hereto
1997-12-28 00:55Arthur B. Purvis>i just bought mouseonmars' audiotacker on a whim and lo, what a great >piece of work. i'm
From:
Arthur B. Purvis
To:
Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 1997 19:55:22 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #1400
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95.971227194950.25736F-100000@sunlab3.princeton.edu>
quoted 3 lines i just bought mouseonmars' audiotacker on a whim and lo, what a great>i just bought mouseonmars' audiotacker on a whim and lo, what a great >piece of work. i'm just curious about what MOM release I should check out >next, and any URLs for discogs/samples.
I thought Autoditacker was a bit disappointing (still a good record, don't get me wrong) after the astounding Cache Couer Naif single (which has vocals by Laetita Sadier (sp?) so you have been warned if you dislike her) and Iahora Tahiti, so I would recommend getting those next... Can't speak on Vulvaland. As for Microstoria, I don't know, I love Oval, but Microstoria leaves me cold, somehow. The remix disc had some nice moments (especially the absurdly named Ui remix) but on the whole, I'd stick to Oval - diskont94 and Systemisch specifically. --- the humble abbott arthur purvis set his hand hereto
1997-12-28 02:03tweibrecht@juno.comOn Sat, 27 Dec 1997 19:39:38 -0500 (EST) "Arthur B. Purvis" <abpurvis@phoenix.Princeton.ED
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 1997 21:03:12 EST
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #1400
permalink · <19971228.210316.7343.1.tweibrecht@juno.com>
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997 19:39:38 -0500 (EST) "Arthur B. Purvis" <abpurvis@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> writes:
quoted 6 lines Besides, someone from Princeton talking about pretentiousness? It>>>> Besides, someone from Princeton talking about pretentiousness? It >is= >>>> to laugh. >>> >>> Umm, fuck you, asshole. >
quoted 24 lines Oh yeah: Your arguments on "young" people are fucking ridiculous.>Oh yeah: Your arguments on "young" people are fucking ridiculous. >Sure, >it's all "new" to me because I'm ca. 20 years old. The only reason >techno >sounds "new" to you is because you haven't heard it before. >Personally, >I've heard enough techno along the lines of "Freek Funk" to make me >want >to puke multicolored streams of violet - same with you and rock and >roll. >The difference is that I don't automatically think Freek Funk is shit >before I actually _listen_ to it - which is what you're doing, and >it's >just making your argument totally baseless and taking your ignorance >of >music made without a drum machine to monumental heights. > >Oh: >Fuck you, shithead. You're obviously a shithead, because you listen >to >Luke Slater. (for the clueless - that was sarcastic irony) > >--- >the humble abbott arthur purvis set his hand hereto
hey merry christmas you people....peace and love and all that shit huh? tomw np: give peace a chance (hahahhahahahahahahaha)