179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages

7 messages · 6 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 3 subjects: (idm) fila brazillia.... · (idm) re: techno has been around for ages · (idm) techno has been around for ages
1996-04-20 09:24John Bus (idm) Techno has been around for ages
├─ 1996-04-20 09:45Daniel London (idm) Fila Brazillia....
│ └─ 1996-04-20 13:58Danny Ryan Re: (idm) Fila Brazillia....
└─ 1996-04-20 21:34Greg Earle (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
1996-04-21 00:49Francois Dion Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
└─ 1996-04-21 01:51Chris.Hilker Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
1996-04-21 15:33Francois Dion Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-04-20 09:24John BusHi, > With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more >rapidly than any music assoc
From:
John Bus
To:
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 1996 19:24:49 +1000 (EST)
Subject:
(idm) Techno has been around for ages
permalink · <Pine.3.05.9604201949.A14027-a100000@dcetsun.syd.dcet.CSIRO.AU>
Hi,
quoted 6 lines With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more> With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more >rapidly than any music associated with any subculture I've been involved with >in the past 20+ years - it will be interesting to see what stuff lasts well >after its present-tense "Man, that takes me right back to Ibiza" or "Wow I >can almost taste that E I was on when I heard <this track> at <that rave>" >context has disappeared
I don't think you're right in using an all encompassing word such as "techno"... Kraftwerk were doing there best stuff around the time of the Sex Pistols, ie, 20 years ago and what else would you call it but techno! Basically I don't thing it's evolved rapidly at all. Progressed yes with all its little off shoots but not evolved so rapidly. As it happens I was actually listening to my early Kraftwerk cds and they sound as fresh as when I first heard them, especially against the likes of some of these retro-electro artists. Regards, John
1996-04-20 09:45Daniel LondonA while back someone posted the track listing and release date for the new Fila Brazilla a
From:
Daniel London
To:
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 1996 10:45:43 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
(idm) Fila Brazillia....
Reply to:
(idm) Techno has been around for ages
permalink · <Pine.OSF.3.91.960420104415.4571A-100000@leofric>
A while back someone posted the track listing and release date for the new Fila Brazilla album on Pork Recordings can someone tell me the release date for this album!? Cheers...
1996-04-20 13:58Danny RyanOn Sat, 20 Apr 1996 10:45:43 +0100 (BST), you wrote: >A while back someone posted the trac
From:
Danny Ryan
To:
Daniel London
Cc:
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 1996 13:58:39 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Fila Brazillia....
Reply to:
(idm) Fila Brazillia....
permalink · <3178ed0e.173547801@post.demon.co.uk>
On Sat, 20 Apr 1996 10:45:43 +0100 (BST), you wrote:
quoted 3 lines A while back someone posted the track listing and release date for the>A while back someone posted the track listing and release date for the >new Fila Brazilla album on Pork Recordings can someone tell me the >release date for this album!?
The UK release date is Monday week (29 April) It's already out on export - Danny _______________________ .' `. | ---\ | Kudos Records Limited | -----\ ---\ | Unit 1, Canada House | \--\ ----\ | Blackburn Road | ----------\ | London NW6 1RZ | --\ ---\ | | --\ ---\ | PH: 071 372 0391 | --\ ----\ | FX: 071 372 0392 | | E-mail danny@kudos.demon.co.uk `._______________________.'
1996-04-20 21:34Greg Earle>> With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more rapidly than any >> music associ
From:
Greg Earle
To:
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:34:14 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
Reply to:
(idm) Techno has been around for ages
permalink · <9604202134.AA16676@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
quoted 10 lines With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more rapidly than any>> With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more rapidly than any >> music associated with any subculture I've been involved with >> in the past 20+ years - it will be interesting to see what stuff lasts well >> after its present-tense "Man, that takes me right back to Ibiza" or "Wow I >> can almost taste that E I was on when I heard <this track> at <that rave>" >> context has disappeared > > I don't think you're right in using an all encompassing word such as > "Techno" ... Kraftwerk were doing their best stuff around the time of the > Sex Pistols, i.e., 20 years ago and what else would you call it but Techno!
I wouldn't call their old work "Techno", it's more like "Electronic" that is the roots of what we *now know today* as "Techno". I was using the term "Techno" in the current-day (context, context (-: ) vernacular.
quoted 2 lines Basically I don't think it's evolved rapidly at all. Progressed yes, with> Basically I don't think it's evolved rapidly at all. Progressed yes, with > all its little off shoots, but not evolved so rapidly.
I think grabbing Kraftwerk as a singularity and using that as a basis for your evaluation is specious at best. I stand by my claim. There have been times in the past 5 years where the music of time N was already "obsolete" by the time N+6 months. I've never seen such a fast period of change in musical genres like that. The music of 1996 doesn't remotely sound like the music of 1991 to my ears. 1991-1992 Techno music almost sounds "quaint" now.
quoted 3 lines As it happens I was actually listening to my early Kraftwerk CDs and they> As it happens I was actually listening to my early Kraftwerk CDs and they > sound as fresh as when I first heard them, especially against the likes of > some of these retro-Electro artists.
Again, a specious comparison. Why compare it against the people who are *deliberately* trying to do something which is a re-creation/evolution of that which came before it, i.e. Nuevo Electro? - Greg
1996-04-21 00:49Francois DionAt 02:34 PM 4/20/96 -0700, you wrote: >>> With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FA
From:
Francois Dion
To:
Greg Earle
Cc:
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 1996 17:49:47 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
permalink · <199604210049.RAA12010@taz.hyperreal.com>
At 02:34 PM 4/20/96 -0700, you wrote:
quoted 9 lines With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more rapidly than any>>> With Techno music having evolved so rapidly - FAR more rapidly than any >>> music associated with any subculture I've been involved with >>> in the past 20+ years >> Kraftwerk were doing their best stuff around the time of the >> Sex Pistols, i.e., 20 years ago and what else would you call it but Techno! > >I wouldn't call their old work "Techno", it's more like "Electronic" that >is the roots of what we *now know today* as "Techno". I was using the term >"Techno" in the current-day (context, context (-: ) vernacular.
John Bus sees it as 1970 something, you see it as 1990 something. It all depend on how mainstream you want it to be before you call it techno, but remember that several "electronic" bands of the 70s and early 80s are still making music and most of them are labeled as techno or ambient. In any case, you cant forget the 1985 techno explosion in clubs, so one can safely say it's 11 years old. Ambient and it's variations (lots of idm music is based on ambient music) are however definitely 70s.
quoted 3 lines I stand by my claim. There have been times in the past 5 years where the>I stand by my claim. There have been times in the past 5 years where the >music of time N was already "obsolete" by the time N+6 months. I've never >seen such a fast period of change in musical genres like that.
Dance music in general seems to be like that. People dont play older records cause they dont want clubbers/ravers to think they are not hot or whatever. Obsolescence would be more an indication of lesser quality products which i think make up a lot of compilation CDs.
quoted 2 lines of 1996 doesn't remotely sound like the music of 1991 to my ears. 1991-1992>of 1996 doesn't remotely sound like the music of 1991 to my ears. 1991-1992 >Techno music almost sounds "quaint" now.
There is at least as much crap techno today as there was in 1991-1992. BTW, Aphex Twin's Didgeridoo is from 1990 on rabbit, released on R&S in 1991. I would definitely not call this "quaint". I would go to events like Saturn 6 (club event with Robert de la Gauthier djing), and this kind of music was regularly played. I do think however that techno has evolved rapidly. Will it continue, i hope so, but i think that there are a few elements that helped techno evolve so rapidly: -midi and samplers put music making power in the hand of anybody who wanted to take a shot at it. Before 1984 you had to know a lot about equipment and music to come up with interesting things. And before people start saying that techno is not done with samplers and midi, i say stop reading the bull in magasines and go see your favorite bands live. Alesis MMT8, ADAT, AKAI S1100, Kurzweil K2000, Roland juno-106, TR-909, Ensoniq EPS-16 etc... all gear used a lot in techno. Ok, so the TB-303 is not, but a bunch have been retrofitted or sampled, and it's a rather recent thing that people have started using this box creatively. -raves (nuff said) -internet: there is a correlation, no doubt. People got to hear more about techno music when they got their accounts at their college/universities in the late eighties/early 90s and bought more, so it got more popular so more people started making techno music or djing (and then venturing a bit in music making with drum machines etc...) Ciao, -- Francois Dion (IdMEDIA) [> Email: francois@hyperreal.com <] ' [> http://www.hyperreal.com/~francois <]
1996-04-21 01:51Chris.Hilker>John Bus sees it as 1970 something, you see it as 1990 something. It all >depend on how m
From:
Chris.Hilker
To:
Date:
Sat, 20 Apr 1996 18:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
permalink · <199604210151.SAA16890@taz.hyperreal.com>
quoted 4 lines John Bus sees it as 1970 something, you see it as 1990 something. It all>John Bus sees it as 1970 something, you see it as 1990 something. It all >depend on how mainstream you want it to be before you call it techno, but >remember that several "electronic" bands of the 70s and early 80s are still >making music and most of them are labeled as techno or ambient.
I'd like to know specifically which bands you mean - certainly Cabaret Voltaire is still a going concern but I'd hardly call anything but their post-'Code' work ambient or techno...Eno's active but he doesn't make techno...Steve Hillage's pre-System 7 work has some brilliant ambient material but nothing I know of that has anything to do with techno. C. -- cspot@hyperreal.com (Chris.Hilker)
1996-04-21 15:33Francois DionAt 06:51 PM 4/20/96 -0700, you wrote: >>remember that several "electronic" bands of the 70
From:
Francois Dion
To:
Chris.Hilker
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 21 Apr 1996 08:33:33 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: Techno has been around for ages
permalink · <199604211533.IAA12637@taz.hyperreal.com>
At 06:51 PM 4/20/96 -0700, you wrote:
quoted 6 lines remember that several "electronic" bands of the 70s and early 80s are still>>remember that several "electronic" bands of the 70s and early 80s are still >>making music and most of them are labeled as techno or ambient. > >I'd like to know specifically which bands you mean - certainly Cabaret >Voltaire is still a going concern but I'd hardly call anything but their >post-'Code' work ambient or techno...
Precisely my point. These bands started as electronic and at some point they were labeled techno. At what date precisely, it's hard to say but it did happen in the 80s, with Hillage however taking the turn only after he had heard that Alex Paterson was playing his old records in clubs, with just rhythms added to mix with the rest of the music (ambient house and techno) and we were not in the 80s anymore.
quoted 1 line Eno's active but he doesn't make techno...>Eno's active but he doesn't make techno...
Well, depends if you count the remix or not. In fact most early 80 material that i consider techno is instrumental,"club mixes" sometimes from the band itself (Rational Youth even has a song that has the word techno in the mix name, for the song Cite Phosphore).
quoted 2 lines Steve Hillage's pre-System 7 work has some brilliant ambient>Steve Hillage's pre-System 7 work has some brilliant ambient >material but nothing I know of that has anything to do with techno.
Hillage made music but also produced other groups. Check out the brilliant instrumentals on Simple Minds 12". Very idm. Plus, add a rhythm to some of his early works with Miquette and bang, idm (see the Orb comment earlier in the text). Check out space (or is it space art - a french group from the seventies - i have the album somewhere i'll check it): electronic spacey music with disco beats - and this is still "a la mode" in techno with the rhythm king, univox, electro-harmonix, rhythm ace and other preset drum boxes with disco beats still in use. Speaking of rhythm ace, i remember at "Reseau Art-Scene" (Art-Scene network) in 1979 there was a band playing electronic music (very similar to the new electro wave present in idm these days) and their drum machine was a rhythm ace, with disco preset. They also had a modular synth. Probably a Roland 100 or something like that. And of course, predating pretty much everybody else (Pierre Henry did electronic music to which you can dance and has a construction similar to techno but is definitely electro-acoustic), Kraftwerk. OMD, Soft Cell and the other bands from the new wave era of the early 80s also had some interesting b-sides, but still sounded new wave even if it was instrumental, but i believe that instrumentals from all these different styles influenced the evolution of techno. Then there are groups like New Order... I think someone could pinpoint the birth of techno somewhere between 77 and 83, depending on what is exactly techno. Surely the rhythms, gear, and absence of vocals are some of the things that generaly define techno. Again, as i said this is not as clearcut as some would think. There seems to be a continuous morphing going on from around 1977 to present day. In the previous paragraphs i used french or french canadian bands for my example, but this is simply because i know this scene better than the American, but i'm sure you can dig in those old records and find something. Ciao, -- Francois Dion (IdMEDIA) [> Email: francois@hyperreal.com <] ' [> http://www.hyperreal.com/~francois <]